Response to the comments on "The formation of Pangea" by D.A. Ruban
Data(s) |
2013
|
---|---|
Resumo |
The Variscan structures of the Caucasus region are still quite difficult to decipher, they certainly deserved some in depth investigations in the future. Thus, it is right to question any paleogeographic models proposed in that area, as made by D.A. Ruban. We present here the arguments that we used to decide on the distribution of the terranes in that region. The Transcaucasus massif is regarded as pertaining to the Galatian super-terrane, whereas, the Great Caucasus terrane belongs to the Hanseatic ribbon terrane. The latter was a part of Hunia, detached from Laurussia in the Devonian. |
Identificador |
http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_DC076EB3AA98 isbn:0040-1951 doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2013.09.004 |
Idioma(s) |
en |
Fonte |
Tectonophysics, vol. 608, pp. 1445-1447 |
Palavras-Chave | #Plate tectonic reconstruction; Greater Caucasus; Paleozoic; Gondwana |
Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article article |