Response to the comments on "The formation of Pangea" by D.A. Ruban


Autoria(s): Stampfli G.M.
Data(s)

2013

Resumo

The Variscan structures of the Caucasus region are still quite difficult to decipher, they certainly deserved some in depth investigations in the future. Thus, it is right to question any paleogeographic models proposed in that area, as made by D.A. Ruban. We present here the arguments that we used to decide on the distribution of the terranes in that region. The Transcaucasus massif is regarded as pertaining to the Galatian super-terrane, whereas, the Great Caucasus terrane belongs to the Hanseatic ribbon terrane. The latter was a part of Hunia, detached from Laurussia in the Devonian.

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_DC076EB3AA98

isbn:0040-1951

doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2013.09.004

http://www.sciencedirect.com

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Tectonophysics, vol. 608, pp. 1445-1447

Palavras-Chave #Plate tectonic reconstruction; Greater Caucasus; Paleozoic; Gondwana
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

article