Official Positions for FRAX® clinical regarding biochemical markers from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX®.


Autoria(s): McCloskey E.V.; Vasikaran S.; Cooper C.; FRAX(®) Position Development Conference Members
Data(s)

2011

Resumo

The best indirect evidence that increased bone turnover contributes to fracture risk is the fact that most of the proven therapies for osteoporosis are inhibitors of bone turnover. The evidence base that we can use biochemical markers of bone turnover in the assessment of fracture risk is somewhat less convincing. This relates to natural variability in the markers, problems with the assays, disparity in the statistical analyses of relevant studies and the independence of their contribution to fracture risk. More research is clearly required to address these deficiencies before biochemical markers might contribute a useful independent risk factor for inclusion in FRAX(®).

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_D598908841E1

isbn:1094-6950 (Print)

pmid:21810528

doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.008

isiid:000293989900008

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 220-222

Palavras-Chave #Absorptiometry, Photon; Biological Markers/blood; Bone Density; Bone Remodeling; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Femur Neck/radiography; Fractures, Bone/diagnosis; Fractures, Bone/etiology; Humans; Osteoporosis/diagnosis; Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/review

article