Quality Control/Quality Assurance Testing for Joint Density and Segregation of Asphalt Mixtures, TR-623, 2013


Autoria(s): Desconhecido
Data(s)

01/04/2013

Resumo

Longitudinal joint quality control/assurance is essential to the successful performance of asphalt pavements and it has received considerable amount of attention in recent years. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the level of compaction at the longitudinal joint and determine the effect of segregation on the longitudinal joint performance. Five paving projects with the use of traditional butt joint, infrared joint heater, edge restraint by milling and modified butt joint with the hot pinch longitudinal joint construction techniques were selected in this study. For each project, field density and permeability tests were made and cores from the pavement were obtained for in-lab permeability, air void and indirect tensile strength. Asphalt content and gradations were also obtained to determine the joint segregation. In general, this study finds that the minimum required joint density should be around 90.0% of the theoretical maximum density based on the AASHTO T166 method. The restrained-edge by milling and butt joint with the infrared heat treatment construction methods both create the joint density higher than this 90.0% limit. Traditional butt joint exhibits lower density and higher permeability than the criterion. In addition, all of the projects appear to have segregation at the longitudinal joint except for the edge-restraint by milling method.

Formato

pdf

pdf

Identificador

http://publications.iowa.gov/14933/1/IA_DOT_TR-623_InTrans_joint_density_seg_asphalt.pdf

http://publications.iowa.gov/14933/2/IA_DOT_TR-623_InTrans_joint_density_seg_asphalt_t2.pdf

(2013) Quality Control/Quality Assurance Testing for Joint Density and Segregation of Asphalt Mixtures, TR-623, 2013. Transportation, Department of

Idioma(s)

en

en

Relação

http://publications.iowa.gov/14933/

Palavras-Chave #Transportation #Roads and highways #Research #Concrete
Tipo

Departmental Report

NonPeerReviewed