Systematic review o f the Perforation Risk in S tenosing Eosinophilic Esophagitis: D ilation is much s afer than initially reported

Background a nd A ims: D ilation of stenosing EosinophilicEsophagitis (EoE) is considered a high-risk procedure asperforation rates o f up to 9% of patients h ave been reported.Goal: To systematically e valuate the dilation-associatedperforation risk in stenosing EoE.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performedusing pubmed and Embase. Keywords used were "eosinophilicesophagitis", "dilation", "perforation", and "complications".Results: F rom 2002 to 2007 7 case s eries including 85patients r eported perforations i n 5 patients ( perforation r ate6%). The highest perforation rate was reported in a series of 36patients d ocumenting 3 perforations ( 9%). In 2 010 and 2011three large studies r eporting o n a total o f 404 patientsdocumented a perforation in 3 patients (0.74%). The perforationrate reported in small case series before 2010 was significantlyhigher compared to the r ates since 2 010 ( P <0.001). Theoverall p erforation frequency is 8 /489 patients (1.6%). Amedian of 3 endoscopic sessions with dilations were performedper patient, thereby leading to a perforation rate of 0.53% perendoscopy. Follow-up information on EoE p atients w ithperforation was available in 6 s tudies, all patients c ould bemanaged conservatively, dilation-associated mortality waszero.Conclusions: D ilation of stenosing EoE h as a m uch lowerperforation risk as r eported in e arlier c ase series. Theperforation rate per endoscopy (0.53%) is much lower than theone reported for d ilation of achalasia ( 2-4%). T aking intoaccount t he latest data, dilation of stenosing EoE c an beregarded as a safe procedure.