John Addington Symonds. A Problem in Greek Ethics. Plutarch's Eroticus quoted only in some footnotes? Why?


Autoria(s): Gilabert Barberà, Pau
Contribuinte(s)

Universitat de Barcelona

Data(s)

04/05/2010

Resumo

It is certainly astonishing that an innovating study about the Greek pederasty in England like the one by John Addington Symonds does not quote Plutarch's Eroticus -in fact, it is only cited in some footnotes-, if one bears in mind that this dialogue is an accurate philosophical reflection on Greek eros, in which very often significant ethical themes are approached. The aim of this article is just to reveal the different reasons for such an omission.

Podeu consultar la versió en castellà a: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/12184 ; i en català a: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/12185

Versió de l'article anteriorment publicat a: The Statesman in Plutarch's Works. Volume I: Plutarch's Statesman and His Aftermath: Political, and Literary Aspects (edited by Lukas de Blois, Jeroen Bons, Ton Kessels & Dirk M. Schenkeveld). Leiden, Boston: Brill, Mnemosyne Supplementa, 2004, pp. 297-307

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/2445/12183

Idioma(s)

eng

Direitos

cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Gilabert, 2004

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</a>

Palavras-Chave #Plutarc. Amatorius #Filosofia grega #Eros (Divinitat grega) #Sexualitat grega #Symonds, John Addington. A problem in Greek ethics #Symonds, John Addington. A problem in Greek ethics #Plutarch. Amatorius #Greek philosophy #Eros (Greek deity) #Sex in ancient Greece
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart