Indicators used by clinicians to assess pain in the brain injured

INTRODUCTION. The assessment of pain in critically ill brain-injured patients is challenging for health professionals. In addition to be unable to self-report, the confused and stereotyped behaviors of these patients are likely to alter their ''normal'' pain responses. Therefore, the pain indicators observed in the general critically ill population may not be appropriate. OBJECTIVES. To identify behavioral and physiological indicators used by clinicians to assess pain in critically ill brain-injured patients who are unable to self-report. METHODS.Amixed-method design was used with the first step being the combination of the results of an integrative literature review with the results of nominal groups of 12 nurses and four physicians. The second step involved a web-based survey to establish content validity. Fourteen experts (clinicians and academics) from three French speaking European countries rated the relevance of each indicator. A content validity index (CVI) was computed for each indicator (I-CVI) and for each category (S-CVI). RESULTS. The first step generated 52 indicators. These indicators were classified into six categories: facial expressions, position/movement, muscle tension, vocalization, compliance with ventilator, and physiological indicators. In the second step, the agreement between raters was high with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92). The I-CVIs ranged from 0.07 to 1. Indicators with an I-CVI below 0.5 (n = 12) were not retained, resulting in a final list of 30 indicators. The CVI for this final list was 0.75 with categories ranging from 0.67 (compliance with ventilation) to 0.87 (vocalization). CONCLUSIONS. This process identified specific pain indicators for critically ill braininjured patients. Further evaluation is in progress to test the validity and relevance of these indicators in the clinical setting.