Characterization of CD4+ CD25+ T cells in solid organ transplant recipients

Although important progresses have been achieved in the therapeutic management of transplant recipients, acute and chronic rejections remain the leading causes of premature graft loss after solid organ transplantation. This, together with the undesirable side effects of immunosuppressive drugs, has significant implications for the long-term outcome of transplant recipients. Thus, a better understanding of the immunological events occurring after transplantation is essential. The immune system plays an ambivalent role in the outcome of a graft. On one hand, some T lymphocytes with effector functions (called alloreactive) can mediate a cascade of events eventually resulting in the rejection, either acute or chronic, of the grafted organ ; on the other hand, a small subset of T lymphocytes, called regulatory T cells, has been shown to be implicated in the control of these harmful rejection responses, among other things. Thus, we focused our interest on the study of the balance between circulating effectors (alloreactive) and regulatory T lymphocytes, which seems to play an important role in the outcome of allografts, in the context of kidney transplantation. The results were correlated with various variables such as the clinical status of the patients, the immunosuppressive drugs used as induction or maintenance agents, and past or current episodes of rejection. We observed that the percentage of the alloreactive T lymphocyte population was correlated with the clinical status of the kidney transplant recipients. Indeed, the highest percentage was found in patients suffering from chronic humoral rejection, whilst patients on no or only minimal immunosuppressive treatment or on sirolimus-based immunosuppression displayed a percentage comparable to healthy non-transplanted individuals. During the first year after renal transplantation, the balance between effectors and regulatory T lymphocytes was tipped towards the detrimental effector immune response, with the two induction agents studied (thymoglobulin and basiliximab). Overall, these results indicate that monitoring these immunological parameters may be very useful for the clinical follow-up of transplant recipients ; these tests may contribute to identify patients who are more likely to develop rejection or, on the contrary, who tolerate well their graft, in order to adapt the immunosuppressive treatment on an individual basis.