Methodological assessment of HCC literature.


Autoria(s): Daniele G.; Costa N.; Lorusso V.; Costa-Maia J.; Pache I.; Pirisi M.
Data(s)

2013

Resumo

Despite the fact that the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a major health problem, very few interventions are available for this disease, and only sorafenib is approved for the treatment of advanced disease. Of note, only very few interventions have been thoroughly evaluated over time for HCC patients compared with several hundreds in other, equally highly lethal, tumours. Additionally, clinical trials in HCC have often been questioned for poor design and methodological issues. As a consequence, a gap between what is measured in clinical trials and what clinicians have to face in daily practice often occurs. As a result of this scenario, even the most recent guidelines for treatment of HCC patients use low strength evidence to make recommendations. In this review, we will discuss some of the potential methodological issues hindering a rational development of new treatments for HCC patients.

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_7D557AAE02D4

isbn:1569-8041 (Electronic)

pmid:23715943

doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt052

isiid:000319817000002

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Annals of Oncology, vol. 24, no. Suppl. 2, pp. ii6-ii14

Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/review

article