High Specificity of C4d/CD68 Staining for the Diagnosis of Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Heart Transplantation.

In heart transplantation (HTx), acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is infrequent but carries high mortality and increased risk of graft vasculopathy. The diagnosis requires evidence of acute graft dysfunction, capillary lesions on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), and immunopathological criteria of antibodymediated injury. Multiple markers of antibody-mediated injuries have been proposed, but there is ample debate on their usefulness. In kidney transplantation, C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries is a reliable marker of alloantibody-dependant graft injury. In this study, we prospectively screened all EMBs for C4d and CD68 in new HTx recipients, and correlated pathological fi ndings with immunological evidence of donor-specifi c antibodies (DSA) and graft dysfunction. Methods Between Nov 05 and Aug 08, we had 22 HTx, and 17 cases were analysed. All recipients received polyclonal rabbit anti-thymocytes globulin, calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids (weaning in 6 -12 months). They had EMB every 1-2 weeks in the fi rst 3 months, and then monthly for 9 months. C4d and CD 68 were assessed by immunochemistry. Echocardiography and DSA assessment or crossmatch (early phase) were realised if C4d or CD68 staining was positive. Results There was 1 early and 1 late AMR. Table 1 C4d and CD68 positive, at least 1 EMB 6 / 17; 35% 1 treated C4d and CD68 positive, at least 2 consecutive EMBs 3 / 17; 17.5% 1 treated C4d and CD68 positive, and graft dysfunction 1 / 17; 6% 1 treated C4d and CD68 positive, with DSA and crossmatch + 1 / 17; 6% 1 treated Table 2 C4d and CD68 positive, at least 1 EMB 1 / 17; 6% 1 treated C4d and CD68 positive, at least 2 consecutive EMBs 1 /17; 6% 1 treated C4d and CD68 positive and graft dysfunction 1 / 17; 6% 1 treated C4d and CD68 positive, and + DSA 1 / 17; 6% 1 treated Conclusion In this single-center experience, C4d / CD68 positive staining was frequent in the early phase and raised the question of false positive cases of AMR. However, these markers showed high specifi city for the diagnosis of AMR in the late phase. Of course these data need to be confi rmed in larger multi-center studies.