Designing phase III or IV trials for vaccines: choosing between individual or cluster randomised trial designs.


Autoria(s): Vaucher P.
Data(s)

2009

Resumo

The choice of design between individual randomisation, cluster or pseudo-cluster randomisation is often made difficult. Clear methodological guidelines have been given for trials in general practice, but not for vaccine trials. This article proposes a decisional flow-chart to choose the most adapted design for evaluating the effectiveness of a vaccine in large-scale studies. Six criteria have been identified: importance of herd immunity or herd protection, ability to delimit epidemiological units, homogeneity of transmission probability across sub-populations, population's acceptability of randomisation, availability of logistical resources, and estimated sample size. This easy to use decisional method could help sponsors, trial steering committees and ethical committees adopt the most suitable design.

Identificador

https://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_66F8BD6083FA

isbn:0264-410X (Print)

pmid:19368773

doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.01.107

isiid:000264727900007

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Vaccine, vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 1928-1931

Palavras-Chave #Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/methods; Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic/methods; Cluster Analysis; Disease Transmission, Infectious; Epidemiology; Humans; Immunity, Herd; Patient Selection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods; Research Design; Sample Size; Vaccines
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

article