A threefold dose intensity treatment with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide for patients with small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial.


Autoria(s): Leyvraz S.; Pampallona S.; Martinelli G.; Ploner F.; Perey L.; Aversa S.; Peters S.; Brunsvig P.; Montes A.; Lange A.; Yilmaz U.; Rosti G.; Solid Tumors Working Party of the European Group for Blood; Marrow Transplantation
Data(s)

01/04/2008

Resumo

BACKGROUND: The dose intensity of chemotherapy can be increased to the highest possible level by early administration of multiple and sequential high-dose cycles supported by transfusion with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). A randomized trial was performed to test the impact of such dose intensification on the long-term survival of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: Patients who had limited or extensive SCLC with no more than two metastatic sites were randomly assigned to high-dose (High, n = 69) or standard-dose (Std, n = 71) chemotherapy with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE). High-ICE cycles were supported by transfusion with PBPCs that were collected after two cycles of treatment with epidoxorubicin at 150 mg/m(2), paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2), and filgrastim. The primary outcome was 3-year survival. Comparisons between response rates and toxic effects within subgroups (limited or extensive disease, liver metastases or no liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, normal or abnormal lactate dehydrogenase levels) were also performed. RESULTS: Median relative dose intensity in the High-ICE arm was 293% (range = 174%-392%) of that in the Std-ICE arm. The 3-year survival rates were 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 10% to 29%) and 19% (95% CI = 11% to 30%) in the High-ICE and Std-ICE arms, respectively. No differences were observed between the High-ICE and Std-ICE arms in overall response (n = 54 [78%, 95% CI = 67% to 87%] and n = 48 [68%, 95% CI = 55% to 78%], respectively) or complete response (n = 27 [39%, 95% CI = 28% to 52%] and n = 24 [34%, 95% CI = 23% to 46%], respectively). Subgroup analyses showed no benefit for any outcome from High-ICE treatment. Hematologic toxicity was substantial in the Std-ICE arm (grade > or = 3 neutropenia, n = 49 [70%]; anemia, n = 17 [25%]; thrombopenia, n = 17 [25%]), and three patients (4%) died from toxicity. High-ICE treatment was predictably associated with severe myelosuppression, and five patients (8%) died from toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcome of SCLC was not improved by raising the dose intensity of ICE chemotherapy by threefold.

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_5EB746C016AC

isbn:1460-2105 (Electronic)

pmid:18398095

doi:10.1093/jnci/djn088

isiid:000255151900008

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 533-541

Palavras-Chave #Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use; Carboplatin/administration & dosage; Carboplatin/adverse effects; Carcinoma, Small Cell/drug therapy; Carcinoma, Small Cell/mortality; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Etoposide/administration & dosage; Etoposide/adverse effects; Female; Hematologic Diseases/chemically induced; Humans; Ifosfamide/administration & dosage; Ifosfamide/adverse effects; Incidence; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy; Lung Neoplasms/mortality; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Prognosis; Research Design; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

article