Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) plus registry experience.


Autoria(s): Pedrazzini G.B.; Radovanovic D.; Vassalli G.; Sürder D.; Moccetti T.; Eberli F.; Urban P.; Windecker S.; Rickli H.; Erne P.; AMIS Plus Investigators
Data(s)

2011

Resumo

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (LM) disease. BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing LM PCI. METHODS: Of 9,075 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) Plus registry between 2005 and June 30, 2010, 6,666 underwent primary PCI. Of them, 348 (5.2%; mean age: 63.5 ± 12.6 years) underwent LM PCI, either isolated (n = 208) or concomitant to PCI for other vessel segments (n = 140). They were compared with 6,318 patients (94.8%; mean age: 61.9 ± 12.5 years) undergoing PCI of non-LM vessel segments only. RESULTS: The LM patients had higher rates of cardiogenic shock (12.2% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001), cardiac arrest (10.6% vs. 6.3%; p < 0.01), in-hospital mortality (10.9% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.001), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (12.4% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001) than non-LM PCI. Rates of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were highest for concurrent LM and non-LM PCI (17.9% and 18.6%, respectively), intermediate for isolated LM PCI (6.3% and 8.3%, respectively), and lowest for non-LM PCI (3.8% and 5.0%, respectively). Rates of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events for LM PCI were higher than for non-LM multivessel PCI (10.9% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001, and 12.4% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001, respectively). LM disease independently predicted in-hospital death (odds ratio: 2.36; 95% confidence interval: 1.34 to 4.17; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Emergent LM PCI in the context of acute myocardial infarction, even including 12% cardiogenic shock, appears to have a remarkably high (89%) in-hospital survival. Concurrent LM and non-LM PCI has worse outcomes than isolated LM PCI.

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_3806FB7C25F8

isbn:1876-7605 (Electronic)

pmid:21700248

doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2011.04.004

isiid:000292369600005

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 627-633

Palavras-Chave #Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods; Confidence Intervals; Coronary Angiography; Female; Health Status Indicators; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction/complications; Myocardial Infarction/mortality; Odds Ratio; Questionnaires; Registries; Risk Factors; Shock, Cardiogenic; Statistics, Nonparametric; Switzerland; Treatment Outcome
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

article