How logrolling can explain the failure of the government coalition in Brazil
| Data(s) |
01/10/2006
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
This article presents an analysis of the behavior of federal representatives in the Brazilian House of Representatives between 1995 and 1998, when a series of constitutional amendments were presented by the president to be voted on by Congress. The objective is to show that the lack of a stable government coalition resulted in costs to society that were not anticipated by the government. The study argues that a logroll - a trade of votes - was the strategy used by the government in order to guarantee the number of votes necessary to approve the amendments. This strategy created a vicious system in which representatives would only vote with the government if they had benefits in return. |
| Formato |
text/html |
| Identificador |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122006000500006 |
| Idioma(s) |
en |
| Publicador |
Fundação Getulio Vargas |
| Fonte |
Revista de Administração Pública v.40 n.5 2006 |
| Palavras-Chave | #logrolling #trade of votes #strategic voting #government coalition #Brazilian House of Representatives #constitutional amendment in Brazil #public choice #rational choice theory |
| Tipo |
journal article |