Physiological and symptomatic responses to cycling and walking in intermittent claudication

To shed light on the potential efficacy of cycling as a resting modality in the treatment of intermittent claudication (IC), this study compared physiological and symptomatic responses to graded walking and cycling tests in claudicants. Sixteen subjects with peripheral arterial disease (resting ankle:brachial index (ABI) < 0.9) and IC completed a maximal graded treadmill walking (T) and cycle (C) Lest after three familiarization tests on each mode. During cacti test, symptoms, oxygen uptake (VO2), minute ventilation (V-E), (respiratory exchange ratio) (RER) and heart rate (HR) were measured, and for 10 min after each Lest the brachial and ankle systolic pressures were recorded, All but One subject experienced calf pain as the primary limiting symptom during T whereas the symptoms were more varied during C and included thigh pain, calf pain and dyspnoea, Although maximal exercise time was significantly longer on C than T (690 +/- 67 vs, 495 +/- 57 s), peak VO2, peak, V-E and peak heart rate during C and T were not different; whereas peak RER was higher during C. These responses during C and T were also positively 1, (P < 0.05) with each other, with the exception of RER. The postexercise systolic pressures were also not different between C and T. However, the peak decline ill ankle pressures from resting values after C and T were not correlated with each other. Thew data demonstrate that cycling and walking induce a similar level of metabolic and cardiovascular strain, but that the primary limiting symptoms and haemodynamic response in an individual's extremity, measured after exercise, can differ substantially between these two modes.