Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs
Contribuinte(s) |
R. Costanza |
---|---|
Data(s) |
01/12/2001
|
Resumo |
Use of chemical inputs such as pesticides has increased agricultural production and productivity. However, negative externalities from such use have increased too. These externalities include damage to agricultural land, fisheries, fauna and flora. Another major externality is the unintentional destruction of beneficial predators of pests thereby increasing the virulence of many species of agricultural pests. Furthermore, increased mortality and morbidity of humans due to exposure to pesticides are recorded especially in developing countries. The costs from these externalities are large and affect farmers' returns. However, despite these high costs, farmers continue to use pesticides and in most countries in increasing quantities. In this paper, we examine this paradox and show why farmers continue to use pesticides despite the increasing costs. We also emphasize 'lock-in' aspects of pesticide use. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Elsevier Science Bv |
Palavras-Chave | #Ecology #Environmental Sciences #Economics #Pesticides #Agriculture #Environment #Human Health #Sustainability #Hysteresis #Exposure #Insect #Birds #Dde #C1 #349999 Economics not elsewhere classified #729999 Economic issues not elsewhere classified |
Tipo |
Journal Article |