Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse


Autoria(s): Maher, C.; Carey, M. P.; Slack, M. C.; Murray, C. J.; Milligan, M.; Schluter, P. J.
Data(s)

01/01/2001

Resumo

This study retrospectively compared 34 women who had a sacrospinous hysteropexy and 36 who had a vaginal hysterectomy and sacrospinous fixation for symptomatic uterine prolapse. All women underwent independent review and examination, with a mean follow-up of 36 months in the hysterectomy group and 26 months in the hysteropexy group.  The subjective success rate was 86% in the hysterectomy group and 78% in the hysteropexy group (P = 0.70). The objective success rate was 72% and 74%, respectively (P = 1.00). The patient-determined satisfaction rate was 86% in the hysterectomy group and 85% in the hysteropexy group (P = 1.00). The operating time in the hysterectomy group was 91 minutes, compared to 59 minutes in the hysteropexy group (P

Identificador

http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:58714

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Springer

Palavras-Chave #Hysterectomy #Sacrospinous hysteropexy #Uterine prolapse #C1
Tipo

Journal Article