Photoelastic Stress Analysis of Different Designs of Cement-Retained Fixed Partial Dentures on Morse Taper Oral Implants


Autoria(s): MENANI, Luiz Ricardo; TIOSSI, Rodrigo; TORRES, Erica Miranda de; RIBEIRO, Ricardo Faria; ALMEIDA, Rossana Pereira de
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2011

Resumo

There is no consensus in literature regarding the best plan for prosthetic rehabilitation with partial multiple adjacent implants to minimize stress generated in the bone-implant interface. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of cemented fixed partial dentures, splinted and nonsplinted, on Morse taper implants and with different types of coating material (ceramic and resin), using photoelastic stress analysis. A photoelastic model of an interposed edentulous space, missing a second premolar and a first molar, and rehabilitated with 4 different types of cemented crowns and supported by 2 adjacent implants was used. Groups were as follows: UC, splinted ceramic crowns; IC, nonsplinted ceramic crowns; UR, splinted resin crowns; and IR, nonsplinted resin crowns. Different vertical static loading conditions were performed: balanced occlusal load, 10 kgf; simultaneous punctiform load on the implanted premolar and molar, 10 kgf; and alternate punctiform load on the implanted premolar and molar, 5 kgf. Changes in stress distribution were analyzed in a polariscope, and digital photographs were taken of each condition to allow comparison of stress pattern distribution around the implants. Cementation of the fixed partial dentures generated stresses between implants. Splinted restorations distributed the stresses more evenly between the implants than nonsplinted when force was applied. Ceramic restorations presented better distribution of stresses than resin restorations. Based on the results obtained, it was concluded that splinted ceramic restorations promote better stress distribution around osseointegrated implants when compared with nonsplinted crowns; metal-ceramic restorations present less stress concentration and magnitude than metal-plastic restorations.

Identificador

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, v.22, n.2, p.674-678, 2011

1049-2275

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/26347

10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182074571

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182074571

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS

Relação

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS

Palavras-Chave #Dental implants #fixed partial dentures #photoelasticity #RESTORATIVE MATERIALS #SUPPORTED PROSTHESES #FIT #COMPLICATIONS #BONE #Surgery
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion