Beef Carcass Contamination by Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Strains in an Abattoir in Brazil: Characterization and Resistance to Antimicrobial Drugs


Autoria(s): RIGOBELO, Everlon Cid; SANTO, Edilene; MARIN, Jose Moacir
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2008

Resumo

A survey was performed to estimate the frequency of Escherichia coli and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) in carcasses obtained from an abattoir in Brazil between February 2006 and June 2007. A total of 216 beef carcasses were sampled at three stages of the slaughter process-preevisceration, postevisceration, and postprocessing-during the rain and dry seasons, respectively. Of the carcasses sampled, 58%, were preevisceration E. coli positive, 38% were postevisceration positive, and 32% postprocessing positive. At the postprocessing stage, the isolation of E. coli was twice as high in the rain season. E. coli was isolated from 85 carcasses of which only 3 (1.4%) were positive for stx-encoding genes. No E. coli O157 serogroup isolates were detected. No antimicrobial resistance was found in nine of the isolates (10% of the total). The most frequent resistances were seen against cephalothin (78%), streptomycin (38%), nalidixic acid (36%), and tetracycline (30%). Multidrug resistance (MDR) to three or more antimicrobial agents was determined in 28 (33%) E. coli isolates. The presence of STEC and MDR strains among the isolates in the beef carcasses emphasizes the importance of proper handling to prevent carcass contamination.

FAPESP[04/15600-4]

Identificador

FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, v.5, n.6, p.811-817, 2008

1535-3141

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/26271

10.1089/fpd.2008.0138

http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2008.0138

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC

Relação

Foodborne Pathogens and Disease

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright MARY ANN LIEBERT INC

Palavras-Chave #SAO-PAULO #ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE #BACTERIAL-RESISTANCE #PROCESSING PLANTS #CATTLE #VIRULENCE #ANIMALS #O157-H7 #PREVALENCE #NON-O157 #Food Science & Technology
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion