Mechanical Testing of Indirect Composite Materials Directly Applied on Implant Abutments


Autoria(s): ANDRIANI JR., Wilson; SUZUKI, Marcelo; BONFANTE, Estevam A.; CARVALHO, Ricardo M.; SILVA, Nelson R.; COELHO, Paulo G.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2010

Resumo

Purpose: To test the strength to failure and fracture mode of three indirect composite materials directly applied onto Ti-6Al-4V implant abutments vs cemented standard porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns. Materials and Methods: Sixty-four locking taper abutments were randomly allocated to four groups and were cleaned in ethanol in an ultrasonic bath for 5 min. After drying under ambient conditions, the abutments were grit blasted and a custom 4-cusp molar crown mold was utilized to produce identical crowns (n = 16 per group) of Tescera (Bisco), Ceramage (Shofu), and Diamond Crown (DRM) according to the manufacturer`s instructions. The porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns were fabricated by conventional means involving the construction and a wax pattern and casting of a metallic coping followed by sintering of increasing layers of porcelain. All crowns were loaded to failure by an indenter placed at one of the cusp tips at a 1 mm/min rate. Subsequently, fracture analysis was performed by means of stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. One-way ANOVA at 95% level of significance was utilized for statistical analysis. Results: The single load to failure (+/- SD) results were: Tescera (1130 +/- 239 N), Ceramage (1099 +/- 257 N), Diamond Crown (1155 +/- 284 N), and PFM (1081 +/- 243 N). Stereomicroscopy analysis showed two distinct failure modes, where the loaded cusp failed either with or without abutment/metallic coping exposure. SEM analysis of the fractures showed multiple crack propagation towards the cervical region of the crown below a region of plastic deformation at the indenter contact region. Conclusion: The three indirect composites and PFM systems fractured at loads higher than those typically associated with normal occlusal function. Although each material had a different composition and handling technique, no significant differences were found concerning their single load to fracture resistance among composite systems and PFM.

Identificador

JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, v.12, n.4, p.311-317, 2010

1461-5185

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/26109

10.3290/j.jad.a17710

http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a17710

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC

Relação

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC

Palavras-Chave #implant #restoration #integrated abutment crown #indirect composite #single unit #CERAMIC DENTAL RESTORATIONS #BOND STRENGTH #PART II #RESIN #ALLOYS #SURVIVAL #METAL #WEAR #TITANIUM #ADHESION #Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion