Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses


Autoria(s): BATISTA, Mauro; BONACHELA, Wellington; SOARES, Janir
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2008

Resumo

The extraction of teeth involves the elimination of extremely sensitive periodontal mechanoreceptors, which play an important role in oral sensory perception. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the recovery of interocclusal sensory perception for micro-thickness in individuals with different types of implant-supported prostheses. Materials and Methods: Wearers of complete dentures (CDs) comprised the negative control group (group A, n=17). The experimental group consisted of wearers of prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants (Group B, n=29), which was subsequently divided into 4 subgroups: B(1) (n=5) - implant supported overdentures (ISO) occluding with CD; B(2) (n=6) - implant-supported fixed prostheses (ISFP) occluding with CD; B3 (n=8) - wearers of maxillary and mandibular ISFP, and B(4) (n=10) - ISFP occluding with natural dentition (ND). Individuals with ND represented the positive control group (Group C, n=24). Aluminum foils measuring 10 mu m, 24 mu m, 30 mu m, 50 mu m, 80 mu m, and 104 mu m thickness were placed within the premolar area, adding up to 120 tests for each individual. Results: The mean tactile thresholds of groups A, B(1), B(2), B(3), B(4), and C were 92 mu m, 27 mu m, 27 mu m, 14 mu m, 10 mu m, and 10 mu m, respectively. [Correction added after publication online 18 April 2008: in the preceding sentence 92 mu m, 27 mu m, 14 mu m, 10 mu m and 10 mu m, was corrected to 92 mu m, 27 mu m, 27 mu m, 14 mu m, 10 mu m and 10 mu m.] The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant difference among groups (P < 0.05). The Dunn test revealed that group A was statistically different from groups C, B(3), and B(4), and that B(1) and B(2) were statistically different from group C. Conclusion: Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses could be observed. Moreover, ISO and/or ISFP combinations may similarly maximize the recovery of osseoperception.

Identificador

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, v.19, n.6, p.565-569, 2008

0905-7161

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/26098

10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01529.x

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01529.x

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

WILEY-BLACKWELL

Relação

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright WILEY-BLACKWELL

Palavras-Chave #dental implant #oral rehabilitation #osseoperception #OSSEOINTEGRATED ORAL IMPLANTS #PERCEPTION #THICKNESS #BRIDGES #Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine #Engineering, Biomedical
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion