Influence of the bonding substrate in dental composite polymerization stress testing


Autoria(s): BOARO, Leticia C.; GONCALVES, Flavia; BRAGA, Roberto R.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2010

Resumo

Our objective was to compare the polymerization stress (sigma(pol)) of a series of composites obtained using poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or glass as bonding substrates, and to compare the results with those from in vitro microleakage of composite restorations. The tested hypothesis was that stress values obtained in a less rigid testing system (i.e. using PMMA) would show a better relationship with microleakage data. Five dental composites were tested: Filtek Z250 (FZ), Z100 (Z1), Concept (CO), Durafill (DU) and Heliomolar (HM). sigma(pol) was determined in 1 mm high specimens inserted between two rods (empty set = 5 mm) of either PMMA or glass. The composite elastic modulus (E) was obtained by three-point bending. sigma(pol) and E data were submitted to a one-way analysis of variance/Tukey test (alpha = 0.05). For the microleakage test (MI), bovine incisors received cylindrical cavities (empty set = 5 mm, h = 2 mm), which were restored in bulk. After storage for 24 h in water, specimens were subjected to dye penetration using AgNO(3) as tracer. Specimens were sectioned twice, perpendicularly, and microleakage was measured (in millimeters) under 20x magnification. Data from MI were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis test. Means (SD) of sigma(pol) (MPa) using glass/PMMA were FZ: 7.5(1.8)(A)/2.5(0.2)(bc); Z1: 7.3(0.5)(A)/2.8(0.3)(ab); CO: 6.8(1.1)(A)/3.2(0.5)(a); DU: 4.5(0.7)(B)/2.0(0.2)(bc); HM: 3.5(0.2)(B)/2.3(0.3)(c). sigma(pol) obtained using PMMA rods were 34-67% lower than with glass. Means (SD) for tooth average/tooth maximum microleakage were FZ: 0.92(0.19)(B)/1.53(0.30)(a); Z1: 1.19(0.21)(A)/1.75(0.20)(a); CO: 1.26(0.25)(A)/1.78(0.24)(a); DU: 0.83(0.30)(B)/1.68(0.46)(a): HM: 0.81(0.27)(B)/1.64(0.54)(a). The tested hypothesis was confirmed, as the composites showed the same ordering both in the polymerization stress test using PMMA rods and in the microleakage test. (C) 2009 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

CAPES-MEC (Coordenacao de Aperfeiqoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)

Identificador

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, v.6, n.2, p.547-551, 2010

1742-7061

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/25782

10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.003

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.003

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

ELSEVIER SCI LTD

Relação

Acta Biomaterialia

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright ELSEVIER SCI LTD

Palavras-Chave #Resin composite #Polymerization stress #Microleakage #Elastic modulus #SHRINKAGE-STRESS #RESIN-COMPOSITES #CONTRACTION STRESS #SYSTEM COMPLIANCE #MICROLEAKAGE #CONFIGURATION #RESTORATION #CAVITIES #Engineering, Biomedical #Materials Science, Biomaterials
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion