Reconstruction of mandibular segmental defects using the guided-bone regeneration technique with polylactide membranes and/or autogenous bone graft: A preliminary study on the influence of membrane permeability


Autoria(s): SVERZUT, Cassio E.; FARIA, Paulo Ep.; MAGDALENA, Carolina M.; TRIVELLATO, Alexandre E.; MELLO-FILHO, Francisco V.; PACCOLA, Cleber A. J.; GOGOLEWSKI, Sylwester; SALATA, Luiz A.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2008

Resumo

Purpose: Bone maintenance after mandibular reconstruction with autogenous iliac crest may be disappointing due to extensive resorption in the long term. The potential of the guided-bone regeneration (GBR) technique to enhance the healing process in segmental defects lacks comprehensive scientific documentation. This study aimed to investigate the influence of polylactide membrane permeability on the fate of iliac bone graft (BG) used to treat mandibular segmental defects. Materials and Methods: Unilateral 10-mm-wide segmental defects were created through the mandibles of 34 mongrel dogs. All defects were mechanically stabilized, and the animals were divided into 6 treatment groups: control, BG alone, microporous membrane (poly L/DL-lactide 80/20%) (Mi); Mi plus BG; microporous laser-perforated (15 cm(2) ratio) membrane (Mip), and Mip plus BG. Calcein fluorochrome was injected intravenously at 3 months, and animal euthanasia was carried out at 6 months postoperatively. Results: Histomorphometry showed that BG protected by Mip was consistently related to larger amounts of bone compared with other groups (P <= .0001). No difference was found between defects treated with Mip alone and BG alone. Mi alone rendered the least bone area and reduced the amount of grafted bone to control levels. Data from bone labeling indicated that the bone formation process was incipient in the BG group at 3 months postoperatively regardless of whether or not it was covered by membrane. In contrast, GBR with Mip tended to enhance bone formation activity at 3 months. Conclusions: The use of Mip alone could be a useful alternative to BG. The combination of Mip membrane and BG efficiently delivered increased bone amounts in segmental defects compared with other treatment modalities. (C) 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

Identificador

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, v.66, n.4, p.647-656, 2008

0278-2391

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/24738

10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.664

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.664

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC

Relação

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC

Palavras-Chave #ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION #RESORBABLE POLYMERIC MEMBRANES #TISSUE REGENERATION #RAT #BARRIER #FLAP #SIZE #PLA #Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion