Left main stenting: do we need another study?


Autoria(s): LEMOS, Pedro A.; KAPPETEIN, Pieter; KALIL-FILHO, Roberto; JATENE, Fabio B.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2010

Resumo

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has long been adopted as the treatment of choice for patients with left main (LM) coronary obstructions. In the past, randomised trials and observational studies have shown an advantage in survival of CABG against medical treatment. Recent studies comparing CABG with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) suggested that angioplasty may play a role as an alternative choice. However, well designed randomised trials to evaluate the relative merits of both therapeutic approaches are lacking. In this article, we review the current scientific evidences and outline issues that currently still need to be addressed in comparing CABG versus PCI for the treatment of LM disease.

Identificador

EUROINTERVENTION, v.6, suppl.J, p.J118-J122, 2010

1774-024X

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/23663

http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?Func=Frame&product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=EndNote&UT=000294137800019&Init=Yes&SrcAuth=ResearchSoft&mode=FullRecord

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

EUROPA EDITION

Relação

Eurointervention

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright EUROPA EDITION

Palavras-Chave #CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE #PACLITAXEL-ELUTING STENTS #CARDIAC-SURGERY SCORE #BARE-METAL STENTS #BYPASS-SURGERY #FOLLOW-UP #SURGICAL REVASCULARIZATION #SYNTAX SYNERGY #MASS-II #STENOSIS
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion