Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Patients


Autoria(s): ANTONOPOULOS, Ioannis M.; NAHAS, William C.; PIOVESAN, Affonso C.; FALCI JR., Renato; KANASHIRO, Hidek; ALVAREZ, Gilberto A.; Srougi, Miguel
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2008

Resumo

OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in renal transplant recipients with clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS A prospective protocol was established between August 2004 and November 2007. In that period, 8 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer were submitted to RRP, and their clinicopathologic data were reviewed. RESULTS The mean age (standard deviation) at surgery was 59.6 +/- 6.7 years (range, 49-67 years). All patients had TIC tumors, except for 1 with a T2A tumor. The mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen value was 4.5 +/- 1.8 ng/mL (range, 1.6-7.0 ng/mL). The mean interval between renal transplantation and RRP was 89.9 +/- 65.1 months (range, 40-209 months). The procedure was well tolerated without major complications, and all patients were discharged on the fifth postoperative day. There was no impairment to bladder descent caused by the presence of the allograft or the ureteroneocystostomy. Urethrovesical anastomosis was easily performed in all cases in the standard manner. Blood transfusion was needed in 2 patients (1 received 2 U and another 5 U of blood). The mean operative duration was 183 +/- 29.7minutes (range, 150-240 minutes), the mean estimated blood loss was 656 +/- 576 mL (range, 100-2000 mL), and no deterioration of graft function was observed. All patients were followed, and the mean follow-up was 10.5 months (range, 2-30 months). Prostate-specific antigen was undetectable in all cases during this time frame. CONCLUSIONS Radical retropubic prostatectomy in renal transplant patients is safe, effective, and can be easily performed in the same manner as described by Walsh, regardless of the presence of the allograft. The only necessary technical modification is the avoidance of ipsilateral lymphadenectomy to prevent damage to the transplanted organ. UROLOGY 72: 1362-1365, 2008. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc.

Identificador

UROLOGY, v.72, n.6, p.1362-1365, 2008

0090-4295

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/23424

10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.041

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.041

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC

Relação

Urology

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC

Palavras-Chave #CARCINOMA #RECIPIENTS #PATTERNS #IMPACT #Urology & Nephrology
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion