Quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography during pharmacological stress for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies


Autoria(s): ABDELMONEIM, Sahar S.; DHOBLE, Abhijeet; BERNIER, Mathieu; ERWIN, Patricia J.; KOROSOGLOU, Grigorios; SENIOR, Roxy; MOIR, Stuart; KOWATSCH, Ingrid; Shu Xian-Hong; MURO, Takashi; DAWSON, Dana; VOGEL, Rolf; WEI, Kevin; WEST, Colin P.; MONTORI, Victor M.; PELLIKKA, Patricia A.; ABDEL-KADER, Samir S.; MULVAGH, Sharon L.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2009

Resumo

Aims We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of quantitative stress myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and results Database search was performed through January 2008. We included studies evaluating accuracy of quantitative stress MCE for detection of CAD compared with coronary angiography or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and measuring reserve parameters of A, beta, and A beta. Data from studies were verified and supplemented by the authors of each study. Using random effects meta-analysis, we estimated weighted mean difference (WMD), likelihood ratios (LRs), diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), and summary area under curve (AUC), all with 95% confidence interval (0). Of 1443 studies, 13 including 627 patients (age range, 38-75 years) and comparing MCE with angiography (n = 10), SPECT (n = 1), or both (n = 2) were eligible. WMD (95% CI) were significantly less in CAD group than no-CAD group: 0.12 (0.06-0.18) (P < 0.001), 1.38 (1.28-1.52) (P < 0.001), and 1.47 (1.18-1.76) (P < 0.001) for A, beta, and A beta reserves, respectively. Pooled LRs for positive test were 1.33 (1.13-1.57), 3.76 (2.43-5.80), and 3.64 (2.87-4.78) and LRs for negative test were 0.68 (0.55-0.83), 0.30 (0.24-0.38), and 0.27 (0.22-0.34) for A, beta, and A beta reserves, respectively. Pooled DORs were 2.09 (1.42-3.07), 15.11 (7.90-28.91), and 14.73 (9.61-22.57) and AUCs were 0.637 (0.594-0.677), 0.851 (0.828-0.872), and 0.859 (0.842-0.750) for A, beta, and A beta reserves, respectively. Conclusion Evidence supports the use of quantitative MCE as a non-invasive test for detection of CAD. Standardizing MCE quantification analysis and adherence to reporting standards for diagnostic tests could enhance the quality of evidence in this field.

Lantheus Medical Imaging

Astellas Pharma, USA

Identificador

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, v.10, n.7, p.813-825, 2009

1525-2167

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/23222

10.1093/ejechocard/jep084

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jep084

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

OXFORD UNIV PRESS

Relação

European Journal of Echocardiography

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright OXFORD UNIV PRESS

Palavras-Chave #Coronary artery disease #Myocardial perfusion #Quantitative contrast #Stress echocardiography #BLOOD-FLOW RESERVE #EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY #REAL-TIME #DOBUTAMINE STRESS #STENOSIS SEVERITY #PERFUSION #QUANTIFICATION #MICROBUBBLES #HUMANS #DIPYRIDAMOLE #Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion