Evaluation of interventions to reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infection: Continuous tailored education versus one basic lecture


Autoria(s): LOBO, Renata D.; LEVIN, Anna S.; OLIVEIRA, Maura S.; GOMES, Laura M. B.; GOBARA, Satiko; PARK, Marcelo; FIGUEIREDO, Valquiria B.; SANTOS, Edzangela de Vasconcelos; COSTA, Silvia F.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2010

Resumo

Background: This study evaluated the impact of 2 models of educational intervention on rates of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CVC-BSIs). Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted between January 2005 and June 2007 in 2 medical intensive care units (designated ICU A and ICU B) in a large teaching hospital. The study was divided into in 3 periods: baseline (only rates were evaluated), preintervention (questionnaire to evaluate knowledge of health care workers [HCWs] and observation of CVC care in both ICUs), and intervention (in ICU A, tailored, continuous intervention; in ICU B, a single lecture). The preintervention and intervention periods for each ICU were compared. Results: During the preintervention period, 940 CVC-days were evaluated in ICUA and 843 CVC-days were evaluated in ICU B. During the intervention period, 2175 CVC-days were evaluated in ICUA and 1694 CVC-days were evaluated in ICU B. Questions regarding CVC insertion, disinfection during catheter manipulation, and use of an alcohol-based product during dressing application were answered correctly by 70%-100% HCWs. Nevertheless, HCWs` adherence to these practices in the preintervention period was low for CVC handling and dressing, hand hygiene (6%-35%), and catheter hub disinfection (45%-68%). During the intervention period, HCWs` adherence to hand hygiene was 48%-98%, and adherence to hub disinfection was 82%-97%. CVC-BSI rates declined in both units. In ICUA, this decrease was progressive and sustained, from 12CVC-BSIs/1000 CVC-days at baseline to 0 after 9 months. In ICU B, the rate initially dropped from 16.2 to 0 CVC-BSIs/1000 CVC-days, but then increased to 13.7 CVC-BSIs/1000 CVC-days. Conclusion: Personal customized, continuous intervention seems to develop a ""culture of prevention"" and is more effective than single intervention, leading to a sustained reduction of infection rates.

CAPES

Identificador

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, v.38, n.6, p.440-448, 2010

0196-6553

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/22188

10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.013

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.013

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

MOSBY-ELSEVIER

Relação

American Journal of Infection Control

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright MOSBY-ELSEVIER

Palavras-Chave #Best practices #prevention #continuous education #bloodstream infection #nosocomial infection #INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS #NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS #IMPACT #PREVENTION #HOSPITALS #MORTALITY #DECREASE #PROGRAM #RATES #ICU #Infectious Diseases
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion