Phosphate Binder Impact on Bone Remodeling and Coronary Calcification - Results from the BRiC Study


Autoria(s): BARRETO, Daniela Veit; BARRETO, Fellype de Carvalho; CARVALHO, Aluizio Barbosa de; CUPPARI, Lilian; DRAIBE, Sergio Antonio; DALBONI, Maria Aparecida; MOYSES, Rosa Maria Affonso; NEVES, Katia Rodrigues; JORGETTI, Vanda; MINAME, Marcio; SANTOS, Raul D.; CANZIANI, Maria Eugenia Fernandes
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2008

Resumo

Background and Aims: Calcium-containing phosphate binders have been shown to increase the progression of vascular calcification in hemodialysis patients. This is a prospective study that compares the effects of calcium acetate and sevelamer on coronary calcification (CAC) and bone histology. Methods: 101 hemodialysis patients were randomized for each phosphate binder and submitted to multislice coronary tomographies and bone biopsies at entry and 12 months. Results: The 71 patients who concluded the study had similar baseline characteristics. On follow-up, the sevelamer group had higher levels of intact parathyroid hormone (498 +/- 352 vs. 326 +/- 236 pg/ml, p = 0.017), bone alkaline phosphatase (38 +/- 24 vs. 28 +/- 15 U/l, p = 0.03) and deoxypyridinoline (135 +/- 107 vs. 89 +/- 71 nmol/l, p = 0.03) and lower LDL cholesterol (74 +/- 21 vs. 91 +/- 28 mg/dl, p = 0.015). Phosphorus (5.8 +/- 1.0 vs. 6 +/- 1.0 mg/dl, p = 0.47) and calcium (1.27 +/- 0.07 vs. 1.23 +/- 0.08 mmol/l, p = 0.68) levels did not differ between groups. CAC progression (35 vs. 24%, p = 0.94) and bone histological diagnosis at baseline and 12 months were similar in both groups. Patients of the sevelamer group with a high turnover at baseline had an increase in bone resorption (eroded surface, ES/BS = 9.0 +/- 5.9 vs. 13.1 +/- 9.5%, p = 0.05), whereas patients of both groups with low turnover at baseline had an improvement in bone formation rate (BFR/BS = 0.015 +/- 0.016 vs. 0.062 +/- 0.078, p = 0.003 for calcium and 0.017 +/- 0.016 vs. 0.071 +/- 0.084 mu m(3)/mu m(2)/day, p = 0.010 for sevelamer). Conclusions: There was no difference in CAC progression or changes in bone remodeling between the calcium and the sevelamer groups. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Identificador

NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, v.110, n.4, p.C273-C283, 2008

1660-2110

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/21380

10.1159/000170783

http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000170783

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

KARGER

Relação

Nephron Clinical Practice

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright KARGER

Palavras-Chave #Cardiovascular disease #Hemodialysis #Phosphate binders #Renal osteodystrophy #Vascular calcification #STAGE RENAL-DISEASE #ULTRAFAST COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY #VASCULAR CALCIFICATION #HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS #ARTERY CALCIFICATION #CALCIDIOL DEFICIENCY #AORTIC CALCIFICATION #PARATHYROID-HORMONE #UREMIC RATS #CALCIUM #Urology & Nephrology
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion