Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good?


Autoria(s): COSTA, Eduardo L. V.; AMATO, Marcelo B. P.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2010

Resumo

Selection of the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to avoid ventilator-induced lung injury in patients under mechanical ventilation is still a matter of debate. Many methods are available, but none is considered the gold standard. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Zhao and colleagues applied a method based on electrical impedance tomography to help select the PEEP that minimized ventilation inhomogeneities. Though promising when alveolar collapse and overdistension are present, this method might be misleading in patients with normal lungs.

Dixtal Biomedica Ltda (Sao Paulo, Brazil)

Identificador

CRITICAL CARE, v.14, n.2, 2010

1466-609X

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/21203

10.1186/cc8901

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8901

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD

Relação

Critical Care

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright BIOMED CENTRAL LTD

Palavras-Chave #RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME #ELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY #END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE #LUNG #TITRATION #STRESSES #COLLAPSE #TRIAL #Critical Care Medicine
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion