Ventilation behavior during upper-body incremental exercise


Autoria(s): Pires, Flavio de Oliveira; Hammond, John; Lima-Silva, Adriano E.; Bertuzzi, Rômulo Cássio de Moraes; Kiss, Maria Augusta Peduti Dal'Molin
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

18/10/2012

18/10/2012

2011

Resumo

Pires, FO, Hammond, J, Lima-Silva, AE, Bertuzzi, RCM, and Kiss, MAPDM. Ventilation behavior during upper-body incremental exercise. J Strength Cond Res 25(1): 225-230, 2011-This study tested the ventilation (V(E)) behavior during upper-body incremental exercise by mathematical models that calculate 1 or 2 thresholds and compared the thresholds identified by mathematical models with V-slope, ventilatory equivalent for oxygen uptake (V(E)/(V) over dotO(2)), and ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide uptake (V(E)/(V) over dotCO(2)). Fourteen rock climbers underwent an upper-body incremental test on a cycle ergometer with increases of approximately 20 W.min(-1) until exhaustion at a cranking frequency of approximately 90 rpm. The V(E) data were smoothed to 10-second averages for V(E) time plotting. The bisegmental and the 3-segmental linear regression models were calculated from 1 or 2 intercepts that best shared the V(E) curve in 2 or 3 linear segments. The ventilatory threshold(s) was determined mathematically by the intercept(s) obtained by bisegmental and 3-segmental models, by V-slope model, or visually by V(E)/(V) over dotO(2) and V(E)/(V) over dotCO(2). There was no difference between bisegmental (mean square error [MSE] = 35.3 +/- 32.7 l.min(-1)) and 3-segmental (MSE = 44.9 +/- 47.8 l.min(-1)) models in fitted data. There was no difference between ventilatory threshold identified by the bisegmental (28.2 +/- 6.8 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)) and second ventilatory threshold identified by the 3-segmental (30.0 +/- 5.1 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)), V(E)/(V) over dotO(2) (28.8 +/- 5.5 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)), or V-slope (28.5 +/- 5.6 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)). However, the first ventilatory threshold identified by 3-segmental (23.1 +/- 4.9 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)) or by VE/(V) over dotO(2) (24.9 +/- 4.4 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)) was different from these 4. The V(E) behavior during upper-body exercise tends to show only 1 ventilatory threshold. These findings have practical implications because this point is frequently used for aerobic training prescription in healthy subjects, athletes, and in elderly or diseased populations. The ventilatory threshold identified by V(E) curve should be used for aerobic training prescription in healthy subjects and athletes.

CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)

Identificador

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, v.25, n.1, p.225-230, 2011

1064-8011

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/17364

10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b2b895

http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b2b895

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS

Relação

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS

Palavras-Chave #segmental linear regression #mathematical model #aerobic training #ventilatory threshold #ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD #BLOOD LACTATE #LEG EXERCISE #ARM #EFFICIENCY #RESPONSES #INCREASE #MODELS #POINT #Sport Sciences
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion