Improving Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning With a Continuing Education Course


Autoria(s): CRUZ, Dina Monteiro; PIMENTA, Cibele Mattos; LUNNEY, Margaret
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

18/10/2012

18/10/2012

2009

Resumo

Background: Continuing education courses related to critical thinking and clinical reasoning are needed to improve the accuracy of diagnosis. Method: This study evaluated a 4-day, 16-hour continuing education course conducted in Brazil. Thirty-nine nurses completed a pretest and a posttest consisting of two written case studies designed to measure the accuracy of nurses` diagnoses. Results: There were significant differences in accuracy from pretest to posttest for case 1 (p = .008) and case 2 (p = .042) and overall (p = .001). Conclusion: Continuing education courses should be implemented to improve the accuracy of nurses` diagnoses. J Contin Educ Nurs 2009;40(3):121-127.

FAPESP Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo

Identificador

JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, v.40, n.3, p.121-127, 2009

0022-0124

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/17255

http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?Func=Frame&product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=EndNote&UT=000285728700007&Init=Yes&SrcAuth=ResearchSoft&mode=FullRecord

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

SLACK INC

Relação

Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright SLACK INC

Palavras-Chave #DECISION-MAKING #NURSING PRACTICE #ACUTE CONFUSION #OLDER-ADULTS #NURSES #CARE #NOVICE #WORK #Nursing
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion