Improving Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning With a Continuing Education Course
Contribuinte(s) |
UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO |
---|---|
Data(s) |
18/10/2012
18/10/2012
2009
|
Resumo |
Background: Continuing education courses related to critical thinking and clinical reasoning are needed to improve the accuracy of diagnosis. Method: This study evaluated a 4-day, 16-hour continuing education course conducted in Brazil. Thirty-nine nurses completed a pretest and a posttest consisting of two written case studies designed to measure the accuracy of nurses` diagnoses. Results: There were significant differences in accuracy from pretest to posttest for case 1 (p = .008) and case 2 (p = .042) and overall (p = .001). Conclusion: Continuing education courses should be implemented to improve the accuracy of nurses` diagnoses. J Contin Educ Nurs 2009;40(3):121-127. FAPESP Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo |
Identificador |
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, v.40, n.3, p.121-127, 2009 0022-0124 |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
SLACK INC |
Relação |
Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing |
Direitos |
closedAccess Copyright SLACK INC |
Palavras-Chave | #DECISION-MAKING #NURSING PRACTICE #ACUTE CONFUSION #OLDER-ADULTS #NURSES #CARE #NOVICE #WORK #Nursing |
Tipo |
article original article publishedVersion |