Improving sample representativeness in environmental studies: a major component for the uncertainty budget


Autoria(s): FRANCA, Elvis J. De; FERNANDES, Elisabete A. De Nadai; BACCHI, Marcio A.; BODE, Peter; SOLDT, Rob T. M. van
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

18/10/2012

18/10/2012

2009

Resumo

For environmental quality assessment, INAA has been applied for determining chemical elements in small (200 mg) and large (200 g) samples of leaves from 200 trees. By applying the Ingamells` constant, the expected percent standard deviation was estimated in 0.9-2.2% for 200 mg samples. Otherwise, for composite samples (200 g), expected standard deviation varied from 0.5 to 10% in spite of analytical uncertainties ranging from 2 to 30%. Results thereby suggested the expression of the degree of representativeness as a source of uncertainty, contributing for increasing of the reliability of environmental studies mainly in the case of composite samples.

FAPESP State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation[03/01075-2]

European Union Programme of High Level Scholarships for Latin America[E04D041455BR]

Identificador

JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, v.282, n.1, p.125-132, 2009

0236-5731

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/17022

10.1007/s10967-009-0326-x

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-009-0326-x

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

SPRINGER

Relação

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright SPRINGER

Palavras-Chave #LS-INAA #Sampling error #Ingamells` constant #Dense Ombrophilous Forest #NEUTRON-ACTIVATION ANALYSIS #GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS #INAA #DESIGN #NAA #Chemistry, Analytical #Chemistry, Inorganic & Nuclear #Nuclear Science & Technology
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion