Prevalence of fibromyalgia in a low socioeconomic status population


Autoria(s): Assumpção, Ana; Cavalcante, Alane B; Capela, Cristina E; Sauer, Juliana F; Chalot, Suellen D; Pereira, Carlos AB; Marques, Amelia P
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/04/2012

19/04/2012

2009

Resumo

Background: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of fibromyalgia, as well as to assess the major symptoms of this syndrome in an adult, low socioeconomic status population assisted by the primary health care system in a city in Brazil. Methods: We cross-sectionally sampled individuals assisted by the public primary health care system (n = 768, 35-60 years old). Participants were interviewed by phone and screened about pain. They were then invited to be clinically assessed (304 accepted). Pain was estimated using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Fibromyalgia was assessed using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), as well as screening for tender points using dolorimetry. Statistical analyses included Bayesian Statistics and the Kruskal-Wallis Anova test (significance level = 5%). Results: From the phone-interview screening, we divided participants (n = 768) in three groups: No Pain (NP) (n = 185); Regional Pain (RP) (n = 388) and Widespread Pain (WP) (n = 106). Among those participating in the clinical assessments, (304 subjects), the prevalence of fibromyalgia was 4.4% (95% confidence interval [2.6%; 6.3%]). Symptoms of pain (VAS and FIQ), feeling well, job ability, fatigue, morning tiredness, stiffness, anxiety and depression were statically different among the groups. In multivariate analyses we found that individuals with FM and WP had significantly higher impairment than those with RP and NP. FM and WP were similarly disabling. Similarly, RP was no significantly different than NP. Conclusion: Fibromyalgia is prevalent in the low socioeconomic status population assisted by the public primary health care system. Prevalence was similar to other studies (4.4%) in a more diverse socioeconomic population. Individuals with FM and WP have significant impact in their well being.

This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) – Foundation for the Support of São Paulo State – and Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento (CNPq) – National Council of Research and Development.

Identificador

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, LONDON, v.10, JUN 8, 2009

1471-2474

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/16666

10.1186/1471-2474-10-64

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-64

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD

Relação

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS

Direitos

openAccess

Copyright BIOMED CENTRAL LTD

Palavras-Chave #CHRONIC MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN #QUALITY-OF-LIFE #LOW-BACK-PAIN #GENERAL-POPULATION #RHEUMATIC-DISEASES #WIDESPREAD PAIN #DISABILITY #THRESHOLD #CRITERIA #COPCORD #Orthopedics #Rheumatology
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion