INFERENCE FOR EIGENVALUES AND EIGENVECTORS OF GAUSSIAN SYMMETRIC MATRICES
Contribuinte(s) |
UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO |
---|---|
Data(s) |
19/04/2012
19/04/2012
2008
|
Resumo |
This article presents maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) and log-likelihood ratio (LLR) tests for the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of Gaussian random symmetric matrices of arbitrary dimension, where the observations are independent repeated samples from one or two populations. These inference problems are relevant in the analysis of diffusion tensor imaging data and polarized cosmic background radiation data, where the observations are, respectively, 3 x 3 and 2 x 2 symmetric positive definite matrices. The parameter sets involved in the inference problems for eigenvalues and eigenvectors are subsets of Euclidean space that are either affine subspaces, embedded submanifolds that are invariant under orthogonal transformations or polyhedral convex cones. We show that for a class of sets that includes the ones considered in this paper, the MLEs of the mean parameter do not depend on the covariance parameters if and only if the covariance structure is orthogonally invariant. Closed-form expressions for the MLEs and the associated LLRs are derived for this covariance structure. William R. and Sara Hart Kimball Stanford Graduate Fellowship Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute CNPq[309470/2006-4] National Science Foundation NSF[DMS-04-0.5970] |
Identificador |
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, v.36, n.6, p.2886-2919, 2008 0090-5364 http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/16657 10.1214/08-AOS628 |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS |
Relação |
Annals of Statistics |
Direitos |
openAccess Copyright INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS |
Palavras-Chave | #Random matrix #maximum likelihood #likelihood ratio test #orthogonally invariant #submanifold #curved exponential family #LIKELIHOOD RATIO TESTS #DIFFUSION-TENSOR MRI #STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS #EXPONENTIAL FAMILIES #GEOMETRY #REGRESSION #Statistics & Probability |
Tipo |
article original article publishedVersion |