Experimental Infection of Rhipicephalus sanguineus Ticks with the Bacterium Rickettsia rickettsii, Using Experimentally Infected Dogs


Autoria(s): PIRANDA, Eliane M.; FACCINI, Joao Luiz H.; PINTER, Adriano; PACHECO, Richard C.; CANCADO, Paulo H. D.; LABRUNA, Marcelo B.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

18/04/2012

18/04/2012

2011

Resumo

We evaluated if Rickettsia rickettsii-experimentally infected dogs could serve as amplifier hosts for Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks. In addition, we checked if Rh. sanguineus ticks that acquired Ri. rickettsii from dogs could transmit the bacterium to susceptible hosts (vector competence), and if these ticks could maintain the bacterium by transstadial and transovarial transmissions. Uninfected larvae, nymphs, and adults of Rh. sanguineus were allowed to feed upon three groups of dogs: groups 1 (G1) and 2 (G2) composed of Ri. rickettsii-infected dogs, infected intraperitoneally and via tick bites, respectively, and group 3 composed of uninfected dogs. After larval and nymphal feeding on rickettsemic dogs, 7.1-15.2% and 35.8-37.9% of the molted nymphs and adults, respectively, were shown by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to be infected by Ri. rickettsii, confirming that both G1 and G2 dogs were efficient sources of rickettsial infection (amplifier host), resulting in transstadial transmission of the agent. These infected nymphs and adults successfully transmitted Ri. rickettsii to guinea pigs, confirming vector competence after acquisition of the infection from rickettsemic dogs. Transovarial transmission of Ri. rickettsii was observed in engorged females that had been infected as nymphs by feeding on both G1 and G2 dogs, but not in engorged females that acquired the infection during adult feeding on these same dogs. In the first case, filial infection rates were generally <50%. No tick exposed to G3 dogs was infected by rickettsiae in this study. No substantial mortality difference was observed between Ri. rickettsii-infected tick groups (G1 and G2) and uninfected tick group (G3). Our results indicate that dogs can be amplifier hosts of Ri. rickettsii for Rh. sanguineus, although only a minority of immature ticks (<45%) should become infected. It appears that Rh. sanguineus, in the absence of horizontal transmission, would not maintain Ri. rickettsii through successive generations, possibly because of low filial infection rates.

Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo-FAPESP[06/50918-0]

Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-CAPES

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico-CNPq

Identificador

VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES, v.11, n.1, p.29-36, 2011

1530-3667

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/15411

10.1089/vbz.2009.0250

http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2009.0250

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC

Relação

Vector-borne and Zoonotic Diseases

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright MARY ANN LIEBERT INC

Palavras-Chave #Brazil #Dog #Rhipicephalus sanguineus #Rickettsia rickettsii #Tick #MOUNTAIN-SPOTTED-FEVER #AMBLYOMMA-CAJENNENSE #SOUTH-AMERICA #SAO-PAULO #STATE #SUSCEPTIBILITY #IDENTIFICATION #TRANSMISSION #ECOLOGY #VECTOR #Public, Environmental & Occupational Health #Infectious Diseases
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion