Influence of specimens' design and manufacturing process on microtensile bond strength to enamel: laboratory and FEA comparison
Contribuinte(s) |
UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO |
---|---|
Data(s) |
26/03/2012
26/03/2012
2010
|
Resumo |
This study evaluated the effect of specimens' design and manufacturing process on microtensile bond strength, internal stress distributions (Finite Element Analysis - FEA) and specimens' integrity by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LCM). Excite was applied to flat enamel surface and a resin composite build-ups were made incrementally with 1-mm increments of Tetric Ceram. Teeth were cut using a diamond disc or a diamond wire, obtaining 0.8 mm² stick-shaped specimens, or were shaped with a Micro Specimen Former, obtaining dumbbell-shaped specimens (n = 10). Samples were randomly selected for SEM and LCM analysis. Remaining samples underwent microtensile test, and results were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey test. FEA dumbbell-shaped model resulted in a more homogeneous stress distribution. Nonetheless, they failed under lower bond strengths (21.83 ± 5.44 MPa)c than stick-shaped specimens (sectioned with wire: 42.93 ± 4.77 MPaª; sectioned with disc: 36.62 ± 3.63 MPa b), due to geometric irregularities related to manufacturing process, as noted in microscopic analyzes. It could be concluded that stick-shaped, nontrimmed specimens, sectioned with diamond wire, are preferred for enamel specimens as they can be prepared in a less destructive, easier, and more precise way. FAPESP |
Identificador |
Materials Research, v.13, n.2, p.253-260, 2010 1516-1439 http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/11252 10.1590/S1516-14392010000200021 http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392010000200021 |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
ABM, ABC, ABPol |
Relação |
Materials Research |
Direitos |
openAccess Copyright ABM, ABC, ABPol |
Palavras-Chave | #Microtensile bond strength #Enamel #Sample geometry #Failure mode #FEA |
Tipo |
article original article publishedVersion |