Mechanical And Photoelastic Analysis Of Four Different Fixation Methods For Mandibular Body Fractures.


Autoria(s): Rodrigues, Danillo Costa; Falci, Saulo Gabriel Moreira; Lauria, Andrezza; Marchiori, Érica Cristina; Moreira, Roger William Fernandes
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS

Data(s)

01/04/2015

27/11/2015

27/11/2015

Resumo

The aim of the present study was to compare four methods of fixation in mandibular body fractures. Mechanical and photoelastic tests were performed using polyurethane and photoelastic resin mandibles, respectively. The study groups contained the following: (I), two miniplates of 2.0 mm; (II) one 2.0 mm plate and an Erich arch bar; (III) one 2.4 mm plate and an Erich arch bar, and (IV) one 2.0 mm plate and one 2.4 mm plate. The differences between the mean values were analyzed using Tukey's test, the Mann-Whitney test and the Bonferroni correction. Group II recorded the lowest resistance, followed by groups I, IV and III. The photoelastic test confirmed the increase of tension in group II. The 2.4 mm system board in linear mandibular body fractures provided more resistance and the use of only one 2.0 mm plate in the central area of the mandible created higher tension.

43

306-11

Identificador

Journal Of Cranio-maxillo-facial Surgery : Official Publication Of The European Association For Cranio-maxillo-facial Surgery. v. 43, n. 3, p. 306-11, 2015-Apr.

1878-4119

10.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.021

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25596966

http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/202047

25596966

Idioma(s)

eng

Relação

Journal Of Cranio-maxillo-facial Surgery : Official Publication Of The European Association For Cranio-maxillo-facial Surgery

J Craniomaxillofac Surg

Direitos

fechado

Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Fonte

PubMed

Palavras-Chave #Bone Fracture #Bone Plates #Fracture Fixation #Mandible
Tipo

Artigo de periódico