Equality, justice and feasibility: an ethical analysis of the WBGU’s budget approach
Data(s) |
01/12/2015
|
---|---|
Resumo |
According to the Budget Approach proposed by the German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), allocating CO2 emission rights to countries on an equal per-capita basis would provide an ethically justified response to global climate change. In this paper, we will highlight four normative issues which beset the WBGU’s Budget Approach: (1) the approach’s core principle of distributive justice, the principle of equality, and its associated policy of emissions egalitarianism are much more complex than it initially appears; (2) the “official” rationale for determining the size of the budget should be modified in order to avoid implausible normative assumptions about the imposition of permissible intergenerational risks; (3) the approach heavily relies on trade-offs between justice and feasibility which should be stated more explicitly; and (4) part of the approach’s ethical appeal depends on policy instruments which are “detachable” from the approach’s core principle of distributive justice. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1409-z http://pure.qub.ac.uk/ws/files/15890660/WBGU_Paper_Revised_Final.pdf |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Fonte |
Schuppert , F & Seidel , C 2015 , ' Equality, justice and feasibility: an ethical analysis of the WBGU’s budget approach ' Climatic Change , vol 133 , no. 3 , pp. 397-406 . DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1409-z |
Tipo |
article |