Equality, justice and feasibility: an ethical analysis of the WBGU’s budget approach


Autoria(s): Schuppert, Fabian; Seidel, Christian
Data(s)

01/12/2015

Resumo

According to the Budget Approach proposed by the German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), allocating CO2 emission rights to countries on an equal per-capita basis would provide an ethically justified response to global climate change. In this paper, we will highlight four normative issues which beset the WBGU’s Budget Approach: (1) the approach’s core principle of distributive justice, the principle of equality, and its associated policy of emissions egalitarianism are much more complex than it initially appears; (2) the “official” rationale for determining the size of the budget should be modified in order to avoid implausible normative assumptions about the imposition of permissible intergenerational risks; (3) the approach heavily relies on trade-offs between justice and feasibility which should be stated more explicitly; and (4) part of the approach’s ethical appeal depends on policy instruments which are “detachable” from the approach’s core principle of distributive justice.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/equality-justice-and-feasibility-an-ethical-analysis-of-the-wbgus-budget-approach(bdf059da-4b70-4158-8866-dbced1f4e8dc).html

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1409-z

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/ws/files/15890660/WBGU_Paper_Revised_Final.pdf

Idioma(s)

eng

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

Schuppert , F & Seidel , C 2015 , ' Equality, justice and feasibility: an ethical analysis of the WBGU’s budget approach ' Climatic Change , vol 133 , no. 3 , pp. 397-406 . DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1409-z

Tipo

article