Review of Legislation and Policy Guidance relating to Adult Social Care in Northern Ireland

Introduction and Background <br/><br/>This research was undertaken by an international team of academics from Queen’s University, Belfast, Leeds University and Penn State University (USA) who have examined models of adult social care provision across thirteen jurisdictions. The aim of this research is to present the Commissioner for Older People in Northern Ireland (COPNI) with possible options for legal reform to adult social care provision for older people in Northern Ireland. <br/><br/>Project Objectives<br/><br/>The agreed objectives of this research were to provide:<br/>• Identification of gaps and issues surrounding the current legislative framework including policy provision for adult social care in Northern Ireland.<br/>• Comparison of Northern Ireland with best practice in other jurisdictions to include (but not be limited to): England and Wales, Republic of Ireland, Scotland and at least two other international examples; Recommendations, based on the above, as to whether there is a need for legislative reform – provision of suggestions other than legislative change (if applicable).<br/>• Recommendations or options based on the above, on how to best change the current framework in Northern Ireland to provide better support outcomes for older people. <br/>• Stakeholder engagement via roundtable event to discuss outcomes/ recommendations.<br/><br/>Structure of Report<br/><br/>The findings from this research are based on an international review of adult social care in the local, national and international contexts. The report will, therefore, firstly present the key recommendations for Northern Ireland which have emerged from a systematic examination and review of adult social care in diverse jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction is then examined in the context of legislative and policy provision and examples of best practice are provided. The final section of the report then compares Northern Ireland to best practice from each of these aforementioned jurisdictions and the discussion entails the background to the report’s final Recommendations. The recommendations in this report are thus directly linked in with the evidence we have gathered across different countries with contrasting systems of welfare.<br/>