Comment on "On the Uniqueness of Stable Marriage Matchings" [Economic Letters 69(1):1-8, 2000]
| Data(s) |
01/12/2013
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
We prove with the help of a counterexample that Lemma 6 and Corollary 7 from Eeckhout [1] are incorrect. |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.09.019 http://pure.qub.ac.uk/ws/files/5521203/accepted_manuscript_for_letters.pdf |
| Idioma(s) |
eng |
| Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Fonte |
Consuegra , M E , Kumar , R & Narasimhan , G 2013 , ' Comment on "On the Uniqueness of Stable Marriage Matchings" [Economic Letters 69(1):1-8, 2000] ' Economics Letters , vol 121 , no. 3 , pp. 468 . DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.09.019 |
| Palavras-Chave | #Stable Matchings #Unique Stable Matching #/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2000/2002 #Economics and Econometrics #/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2000/2003 #Finance |
| Tipo |
article |
