Evaluation of an algorithm to guide patients with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on how to respond to real-time continuous glucose levels:A randomized controlled trial


Autoria(s): Jenkins, Alicia; Krishnamurthy, B.; Best, J.D.; Farish, S.; O'Neal, D.N.; Cameron, F.J.; O'Connell, M.A.; Colman, P.G.; Hamblin, P.S.; Teede, H.; Rodda, C.; Rowley, K.
Data(s)

01/06/2010

Resumo

OBJECTIVE - To evaluate an algorithm guiding responses of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII)-treated type 1 diabetic patients using real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Sixty CSII-treated type 1 diabetic participants (aged 13-70 years, including adult and adolescent subgroups, with A1C =9.5%) were randomized in age-, sex-, and A1C-matched pairs. Phase 1 was an open 16-week multicenter randomized controlled trial. Group A was treated with CSII/RT-CGM with the algorithm, and group B was treated with CSII/RT-CGM without the algorithm. The primary outcome was the difference in time in target (4-10 mmol/l) glucose range on 6-day masked CGM. Secondary outcomes were differences in A1C, low (=3.9 mmol/l) glucose CGM time, and glycemic variability. Phase 2 was the week 16-32 follow-up. Group A was returned to usual care, and group B was provided with the algorithm. Glycemia parameters were as above. Comparisons were made between baseline and 16 weeks and 32 weeks. RESULTS - In phase 1, after withdrawals 29 of 30 subjects were left in group A and 28 of 30 subjects were left in group B. The change in target glucose time did not differ between groups. A1C fell (mean 7.9% [95% CI 7.7-8.2to 7.6% [7.2-8.0]; P <0.03) in group A but not in group B (7.8% [7.5-8.1] to 7.7 [7.3-8.0]; NS) with no difference between groups. More subjects in group A achieved A1C =7% than those in group B (2 of 29 to 14 of 29 vs. 4 of 28 to 7 of 28; P = 0.015). In phase 2, one participant was lost from each group. In group A, A1C returned to baseline with RT-CGM discontinuation but did not change in group B, who continued RT-CGM with addition of the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS - Early but not late algorithm provision to type 1 diabetic patients using CSII/RT-CGM did not increase the target glucose time but increased achievement of A1C =7%. Upon RT-CGM cessation, A1C returned to baseline. © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association.

Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/evaluation-of-an-algorithm-to-guide-patients-with-type-1-diabetes-treated-with-continuous-subcutaneous-insulin-infusion-on-how-to-respond-to-realtime-continuous-glucose-levels(15f7c801-3a1c-4278-9dd5-7375f149343b).html

http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1481

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77956080251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

Idioma(s)

eng

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Fonte

Jenkins , A , Krishnamurthy , B , Best , J D , Farish , S , O'Neal , D N , Cameron , F J , O'Connell , M A , Colman , P G , Hamblin , P S , Teede , H , Rodda , C & Rowley , K 2010 , ' Evaluation of an algorithm to guide patients with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on how to respond to real-time continuous glucose levels : A randomized controlled trial ' Diabetes Care , vol 33 , no. 6 , pp. 1242-1248 . DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1481

Tipo

article