Impact of Testing Procedure on Permeability of Compacted Soils

The commonly used British Standard constant head triaxial permeability (BS) test, for permeability testing of fine grained soils, is known to have a relatively long test duration. Consequently, a reduction in the required time for permeability test provides potential cost savings, to the construction industry (specifically, for use during Construction Quality Control (CQA) of landfill mineral liners). The purpose of this article is to investigate and evaluate alternative short duration testing methods for the measurement of the permeability of fine grained soils. <br/><br/>As part of the investigation the feasibility of an existing method of short duration permeability test, known as the Accelerated Permeability (AP) test was assessed and compared with permeability measured using British Standard method (BS) and Ramp Accelerated Permeability (RAP). Four different fine grained materials, of a variety of physical properties were compacted at various moisture contents to produced analogous samples for testing using three the three different methodologies. Fabric analysis was carried out on specimens derived from post-test samples using Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to assess the effects of testing methodology on soil structure. Results showed that AP testing in general under predicts permeability values derived from the BS test due to large changes in structure of the soil caused by AP test methodology, which is also validated using MIP and SEM observations. RAP testing, in general provides an improvement to the AP test but still under-predicts permeability values. The potential savings in test duration are shown to be relatively minimal for both the AP and RAP tests. <br/>