Superimposed vibration confers no additional benefit compared with resistance training alone


Autoria(s): Carson, R G; Popple, A E; Verschueren, S M P; Riek, S
Data(s)

01/11/2010

Resumo

Eighteen participants (22-43 years) were randomly allocated to one of two groups: resistance training combined with vibration (VIB; five males, four females) or resistance training alone (CON; five males, four females). Each participant trained three sessions per week (three sets of 10 seated calf raises against a load, which was increased progressively from 75% of one repetition maximum (1RM) to 90% 1RM for 4 weeks. For the VIB group, a vibratory stimulus (30 Hz, 2.5 mm amplitude) was applied to the soles of the feet by a vibration platform. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the total amount of work performed during training. Both groups showed a significant increase in maximum voluntary contraction and 1RM (P

Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/superimposed-vibration-confers-no-additional-benefit-compared-with-resistance-training-alone(28086296-5870-4e18-b374-46e28cddf993).html

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00999.x

Idioma(s)

eng

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Fonte

Carson , R G , Popple , A E , Verschueren , S M P & Riek , S 2010 , ' Superimposed vibration confers no additional benefit compared with resistance training alone ' Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports , vol 20 , no. 6 , pp. 827-33 . DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00999.x

Palavras-Chave #/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2732 #Orthopedics and Sports Medicine #/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3600/3612 #Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Tipo

article