Comparing how to Compare: An evaluation of alternative performance measurement systems in the Field of Social Care

Autoria(s): Clarkson, P.; Challis, D.; Davies, S.; Donnelly, Michael; Beech, R.; Hirano, T.
Data(s)

01/01/2010
Formato

application/pdf
Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/comparing-how-to-compare-an-evaluation-of-alternative-performance-measurement-systems-in-the-field-of-social-care(4e9caf84-b4e3-4356-8b63-d22d86990788).html

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356389009350020

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/ws/files/637203/Comparing%20how%20to%20compare%20-%20an%20evaluation%20of%20alternative%20performance%20measurement%20systems%20in%20the%20field%20of%20social%20care%20-%20Evaluation%202010%20-%20M%20Donnelly.pdf

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74349110593&partnerID=8YFLogxK
Idioma(s)

eng
Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Fonte

Clarkson , P , Challis , D , Davies , S , Donnelly , M , Beech , R & Hirano , T 2010 , ' Comparing how to Compare: An evaluation of alternative performance measurement systems in the Field of Social Care ' Evaluation , vol 20 , no. 1 , pp. 59-79 . DOI: 10.1177/1356389009350020
Palavras-Chave #/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3312 #Sociology and Political Science #/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3303 #Development
Tipo

article
Acesso ao item digital