El significado de la prosopopeya de las Leyes en el "Critón" de Platon
| Data(s) |
25/05/2015
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
El objeto de este trabajo es realizar un estudio iusfilosófico sobre la aparición de las Leyes (nómoi) personificadas de Atenas en el Critón de Platón. La prosopopeya de las Leyes resulta ser un aspecto central para poder comprender la obra, ya que éstas entablan un diálogo imaginario con Sócrates en el cual instalan diversos argumentos filosóficos para fundamentar la autoridad de la pólis. A los fines de identificar el valor argumentativo de este recurso en la obra, analizaré el significado del nómos en la Atenas del siglo V a. C. y la naturaleza de las Leyes en el contexto general del diálogo. Se busca demostrar la importancia que tienen aquéllas para explicar la decisión de Sócrates de beber la cicuta. The purpose of this paper is to make a study of the personification of the Laws (nomoi) of Athens in Platoʼs Crito from the philosophy of law. The prosopopoeia of the Laws is a central aspect to understand the play, as they start an imaginary dialogue with Socrates in which various philosophical arguments are exposed to base the authority of the polis. In order to identify the argumentative value of this resource in the play, firstly I will analyze the meaning of nomos in the Athens of the 5th century BC, and secondly the nature of the Laws in the general context of the dialogue. It aims to show the importance of the Laws to explain Socratesʼ decision to drink the hemlock. |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador |
http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASHF/article/view/48678 10.5209/rev_ASHF.2015.v32.n1.48678 |
| Publicador |
Ediciones Complutense |
| Relação |
http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASHF/article/view/48678/45452 /*ref*/Adam, j. ed. Plato. Crito (Cambridge Elementary Classics), Cambridge: University Press, 1984. /*ref*/Allen, R. E. Socrates and Legal Obligation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1980. /*ref*/Brickhouse, T. C. & SMITH, N. D. «Socrates and the Laws of Athens», Philosophy Compass, vol. 1, nro. 6, 2006, pp. 564–570. /*ref*/Buis, E. j. «Θένε τὴν πέτραν (Ar. Av. 54): el problema de la oralidad de la ley y el derecho escrito a través de la comedia antigua» [en línea], IV Congresso Nacional de Estudos Clássicos «Antigüidades» y XII Reunião da Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos, ouro Preto, Brasil, 2001. Disponible en http://www.oocities.org/textossbec/. Consultado en 13/06/2014. /*ref*/Burnet, j. ed. Plato’s Euthyphro, Apology of Socrates and Crito, oxford: Clarendon Press, 1929. /*ref*/Burnet, j. ed. Platonis Opera. Volume. IV: Clitopho, Respublica, Timaeus, Critias (Oxford Classical Texts), oxford: University Press, 1957. /*ref*/Capelle, W. Historia de la Filosofía Griega, Madrid: Gredos, 1981. /*ref*/Casadesús Bordoy, F. trad. Critón. El político. Platón, Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2008. /*ref*/Cohen, D. Law, Violence, and Community in Classical Athens, Cambridge: University Press, 1995. /*ref*/Colaiaco, j. A. Socrates against Athens. Philosophy on Trial, London: Routledge, 2001. /*ref*/Colson, D. D. «‘Crito’ 51A-C: To What Does Socrates owe obedience?», Phronesis, vol. 34, nro. 1, 1989, pp. 27-55. /*ref*/Dasti, M. R. «The Crito’s ‘Integrity’», Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, vol. 40, nro. 2, 2007, pp. 123-140. /*ref*/Eggers Lan, C. trad. Platón. Critón, Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2010. /*ref*/EUBEN, J. P. «Philosophy and Politics in Plato’s Crito», Political Theory, vol. 6, nro. 2, 1978, pp. 149-172. /*ref*/Gagarin, M. & MACDoWELL, D. M. trads. Antiphon & Andocides, Austin: University of Texas Press, 1998. /*ref*/Garver, E. «Plato’s Crito and the Nature of Persuasion and obedience», Polis, vol. 29, nro. 1, 2012, pp. 1-20. /*ref*/Guardini, R. La muerte de Sócrates, Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores, 1997. /*ref*/Guarinoni, R. V. «Sócrates, San Pablo y la obediencia al derecho», en LACLAU M. (dir.) Anuario de Filosofía Jurídica y Social, nro. 28, Buenos Aires, Abeledo- Perrot, 2008, pp. 331-345. /*ref*/Hansen, M. H. «Nomos and psephisma in Fourth-Century Athens», en The Athenian Ecclesia: A Collection of Articles 1976-1983, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 1983, pp. 161-176. /*ref*/Hansen, M. H. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes, Norman: University of oklahoma Press, 1991. /*ref*/Harris, E. M. «Antigone the Lawyer, or the Ambiguities of Nomos», en Democracy and the rule of law in classical Athens: essays on law, society, and politics, Cambridge: University Press, 2006, pp. 41-80. /*ref*/Harris, E. M. «The Rule of Law in Athenian Democracy: Reflections on the judicial oath», Dike, vol. 9, 2006, pp. 157-81. /*ref*/Iriarte, A. Democracia y tragedia, Madrid: Akal, 1996. /*ref*/Irwin, T. H. «Socratic Inquiry and Politics», Ethics, vol. 96, nro. 2, 1986, pp. 400- 415. /*ref*/Irwin, T. H. «Was Socrates Against Democracy?», en KAMTEKAR, R. (ed.), Plato’s Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito: Critical Essays, Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005, pp. 127-149. /*ref*/Jaeger, W. Paideia: los ideales de la cultura griega, México: F.C.E., 2010. /*ref*/Jebb, R. ed. Sophocles: The Plays and Fragments. Part III. Antigone, Cambridge: University Press, 1971. /*ref*/Johnstone, S. Disputes and Democracy. The Consequences of Litigation in Ancient Athens, Austin: University of Texas Press, 1999. /*ref*/Kraut, R. Socrates and the State, New jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984. /*ref*/Laracy, B. The Rule of Law in the Athenian Democracy, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2010. /*ref*/Macdowell, D. M. The law in Classical Athens, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1986. /*ref*/Marías, j. & ARAUjo, M. eds. Aristóteles. Política. Edición bilingüe, Madrid: Institutos de Estudios Políticos, 1951. /*ref*/Martin, R. «Socrates on Disobedience to Law», The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 24, nro. 1, 1970, pp. 21-38. /*ref*/Mcneal, R. A. Law and Rhetoric in the Crito, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1992. /*ref*/Mondolfo, R. Sócrates, Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 1988. /*ref*/Ober, j. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People, Princeton: University Press, 1989. /*ref*/Ostwald, M. «Pindar, Nomos, and Heracles», Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. 69, 1965, pp. 109-138. /*ref*/Ostwald, M. From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law. Law, Society and Politics in Fifth-Century Athens, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986. /*ref*/Ostwald, M. Nomos and the Beginnings of Athenian Democracy, oxford: University Press, 1969. /*ref*/Page, T. E. et al. eds. Andocides. Minor Attic Orators 1. Translated by Maidment, j. K., Cambridge: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), 1941. /*ref*/Page, T. E. et al. eds. Demosthenes against Meidias, Androtion, Aristocrates, Timocrates, Aristogeiton. Translated by Vince, j. H., Cambridge: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), 1935. /*ref*/Page, T. E. et al. eds. Demosthenes: Private Orations, vol. III. Translated by Murray, A. T., Cambridge: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), 1939. /*ref*/Page, T. E. et al. eds. Euripides III. The Bacchanals. The madness of Hercules. The children of Hercules. The Phoenician maidens. Suppliants. Translated by Way, A. S., Cambridge: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), 1988. /*ref*/Page, T. E. et al. eds. Isocrates III. Translated by van Hook, L., Cambridge: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), 1945. /*ref*/Papakonstantinou, Z. Lawmaking and Adjudication in Archaic Greece, London: Duckworth, 2008. /*ref*/Penner, T. «Two Notes on the Crito: The Impotence of the Many, and ‘Persuade or obey’», The Classical Quarterly, New Series, vol. 47, nro. 1, 1997, pp. 153- 166. /*ref*/Raaflaub, K. «Equalities and Inequalities in Athenian Democracy», en oBER, j. & HEDRICK, C. (eds.), Demokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern, Princeton, N.j.: University Press, 1996, pp. 139-174. /*ref*/Rosano, M. j. «Citizenship and Socrates in Plato’s ‘Crito’», The Review of Politics, vol. 62, nro. 3, 2000, pp. 451-477. /*ref*/Sancho Rocher, L. «Teoría Moderna y Demokratía Antigua», en SANCHo RoCHER, L. (coord.), Filosofía y democracia en la Grecia antigua, Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, 2009, pp. 229-262. SICKINGER, j. «The Laws of Athens: Publication, Preservation, Consultation», en HARRIS, E. M. & Rubinstein, L. (eds.), The Law and the Courts in Ancient Greece, London: Duckworth, 2004, pp. 93-109. SPINA, L. Il cittadino alla tribuna. Dirrito e libertà di parola nell’Atene democratica, Napoli: Liguori Editori, 1986. /*ref*/Steadman, G. D. «The Unity of Plato’s ‘Crito’», The Classical Journal, vol. 101, nro. 4, 2006, pp. 361-382. /*ref*/Stone, I. F. The Trial of Socrates, New York: Anchor Books, 1988. /*ref*/Taylor, A. E. Socrates: The Man and his Thought, Garden City: Doubleday, 1953. /*ref*/Thomas, R. «Writing, law, and written law», en GAGARIN, M. & CoHEN, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law, Cambridge: University Press, 2005, pp. 41-60. /*ref*/Thomas, R. «Written in Stone? Liberty, Equality, orality and the Codification of Law», en FoxHALL, L. & LEWIS, A. D. E. (eds.), Greek Law in its Political Setting. Justifications not Justice, oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996, pp. 9-31. /*ref*/Thomas, R. Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992. /*ref*/Todd, S. C. «Lysias against Nikomachos: The Fate of the Expert in Athenian Law», en FoxHALL, L. & LEWIS, A. D. E. (eds.), Greek Law in its Political Setting. Justifications not Justice, oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996, pp. 101-131. /*ref*/Todd, S. C. The Shape of Athenian Law, oxford: University Press, 1995. /*ref*/Tovar, A. Vida de Sócrates, Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2001. /*ref*/Vlastos, G. «The Historical Socrates and Athenian Democracy Author», Political Theory, vol. 11, nro. 4, 1983, pp. 495-516. /*ref*/Wade, F. C. «In Defense of Socrates», The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 25, nro. 2, 1971, pp. 311-325. /*ref*/Wallace, R. W. «Sokrates and democratic law: Plato’s Crito and Apology», en THüR, G (ed.), Symposion 2009: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte, Vienna: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2009, pp. 109-115. /*ref*/Warmington, E. H. ed. Lysias. Translated by Lamb, W. R. M., Cambridge: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), 1967. /*ref*/Weiss, R. Socrates Dissatisfied: An Analysis of Plato’s Crito, Lahman, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001. /*ref*/Woozley, A. D. Law and obedience: the arguments of Plato’s Crito, London: Duckworth, 1979. |
| Direitos |
LICENCE OF USE: The full text articles included on the Scientific Journals of the Complutense website are open access and the property of their authors and/or publishers. Therefore, any reproduction, distribution, public communication and/or total or partial transformation requires their express and written consent. Links to the full text of the articles on the Scientific Journals of the Complutense website should be to the official URL of the Complutense University of Madrid. LICENCIA DE USO: Los artículos a texto completo incluidos en el Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de los artículos del Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses debe efectuarse a la URL oficial de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid |
| Fonte |
Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía; Vol 32, No 1 (2015); 11-39 |
| Palavras-Chave | #Critón; derecho; nómos; obediencia; prosopopeya de las Leyes. #Crito; law; nomos; obedience; prosopopoeia of Laws. |
| Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article Artículo revisado por pares info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
