The text and the tale: differences between scientific reports and scientists’ reportings on the eruption of Mount Chance, Montserrat


Autoria(s): Skinner, Jonathan
Data(s)

2008

Resumo

This article looks at the difference between scientists’ written reports and their oral accounts, explanations and stories. The subject of these discourses is the eruption of Mount Chance on Montserrat, a British Overseas Territory in the Eastern Caribbean, and its continued monitoring and reporting. Scientific notions of risk and uncertainty which feature in these texts and tales will subsequently be examined and critiqued. Further to this, this article will end by pointing out that, ironically, the latter - the tale – can in some cases be a more effective and approximate mode of communication with the public than the former – the text.

Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/the-text-and-the-tale-differences-between-scientific-reports-and-scientists-reportings-on-the-eruption-of-mount-chance-montserrat(6b8a8009-1639-4bac-9e51-55e7af247c43).html

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870801939464

Idioma(s)

eng

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Fonte

Skinner , J 2008 , ' The text and the tale: differences between scientific reports and scientists’ reportings on the eruption of Mount Chance, Montserrat ' Journal of Risk Research , vol 11 , no. 1-2 , pp. 255-267 . DOI: 10.1080/13669870801939464

Tipo

article