Operationalizing the social-ecological systems framework to assess sustainability.


Autoria(s): Leslie, HM; Basurto, X; Nenadovic, M; Sievanen, L; Cavanaugh, KC; Cota-Nieto, JJ; Erisman, BE; Finkbeiner, E; Hinojosa-Arango, G; Moreno-Báez, M; Nagavarapu, S; Reddy, SM; Sánchez-Rodríguez, A; Siegel, K; Ulibarria-Valenzuela, JJ; Weaver, AH; Aburto-Oropeza, O
Data(s)

12/05/2015

Formato

5979 - 5984

Identificador

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25918372

1414640112

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2015, 112 (19), pp. 5979 - 5984

http://hdl.handle.net/10161/11470

1091-6490

Relação

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

10.1073/pnas.1414640112

Palavras-Chave #conservation science #coupled natural and human systems #governance #marine #small-scale fisheries #Animals #Conservation of Natural Resources #Developing Countries #Ecology #Ecosystem #Fisheries #Fishes #Food Supply #Geography #Humans #Mexico #Social Environment #Systems Analysis
Tipo

Journal Article

Cobertura

United States

Resumo

Environmental governance is more effective when the scales of ecological processes are well matched with the human institutions charged with managing human-environment interactions. The social-ecological systems (SESs) framework provides guidance on how to assess the social and ecological dimensions that contribute to sustainable resource use and management, but rarely if ever has been operationalized for multiple localities in a spatially explicit, quantitative manner. Here, we use the case of small-scale fisheries in Baja California Sur, Mexico, to identify distinct SES regions and test key aspects of coupled SESs theory. Regions that exhibit greater potential for social-ecological sustainability in one dimension do not necessarily exhibit it in others, highlighting the importance of integrative, coupled system analyses when implementing spatial planning and other ecosystem-based strategies.

Idioma(s)

eng