Weight loss intervention for young adults using mobile technology: design and rationale of a randomized controlled trial - Cell Phone Intervention for You (CITY).


Autoria(s): Batch, BC; Tyson, C; Bagwell, J; Corsino, L; Intille, S; Lin, PH; Lazenka, T; Bennett, G; Bosworth, HB; Voils, C; Grambow, S; Sutton, A; Bordogna, R; Pangborn, M; Schwager, J; Pilewski, K; Caccia, C; Burroughs, J; Svetkey, LP
Data(s)

01/03/2014

Formato

333 - 341

Identificador

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24462568

S1551-7144(14)00013-5

Contemp Clin Trials, 2014, 37 (2), pp. 333 - 341

http://hdl.handle.net/10161/10732

1559-2030

Relação

Contemp Clin Trials

10.1016/j.cct.2014.01.003

Palavras-Chave #Behavioral intervention #Mobile health #Obesity #Technology #Weight loss #Young adult #Adolescent #Adult #Behavior Therapy #Body Weights and Measures #Cell Phones #Humans #Obesity #Overweight #Self Report #Socioeconomic Factors #Weight Loss #Young Adult
Tipo

Journal Article

Cobertura

United States

Resumo

BACKGROUND: The obesity epidemic has spread to young adults, leading to significant public health implications later in adulthood. Intervention in early adulthood may be an effective public health strategy for reducing the long-term health impact of the epidemic. Few weight loss trials have been conducted in young adults. It is unclear what weight loss strategies are beneficial in this population. PURPOSE: To describe the design and rationale of the NHLBI-sponsored Cell Phone Intervention for You (CITY) study, which is a single center, randomized three-arm trial that compares the impact on weight loss of 1) a behavioral intervention that is delivered almost entirely via cell phone technology (Cell Phone group); and 2) a behavioral intervention delivered mainly through monthly personal coaching calls enhanced by self-monitoring via cell phone (Personal Coaching group), each compared to 3) a usual care, advice-only control condition. METHODS: A total of 365 community-dwelling overweight/obese adults aged 18-35 years were randomized to receive one of these three interventions for 24 months in parallel group design. Study personnel assessing outcomes were blinded to group assignment. The primary outcome is weight change at 24 [corrected] months. We hypothesize that each active intervention will cause more weight loss than the usual care condition. Study completion is anticipated in 2014. CONCLUSIONS: If effective, implementation of the CITY interventions could mitigate the alarming rates of obesity in young adults through promotion of weight loss. ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01092364.

Idioma(s)

ENG