Strategy-proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match


Autoria(s): Abdulkadiroǧlu, A; Pathak, PA; Roth, AE
Data(s)

01/12/2009

Formato

1954 - 1978

Identificador

American Economic Review, 2009, 99 (5), pp. 1954 - 1978

0002-8282

http://hdl.handle.net/10161/3354

http://hdl.handle.net/10161/3354

Idioma(s)

en_US

Relação

American Economic Review

10.1257/aer.99.5.1954

American Economic Review

Tipo

Journal Article

Resumo

The design of the New York City (NYC) high school match involved trade-offs among efficiency, stability, and strategy-proofness that raise new theoretical questions. We analyze a model with indifferences-ties-in school preferences. Simulations with field data and the theory favor breaking indifferences the same way at every school-single tiebreaking-in a student-proposing deferred acceptance mechanism. Any inefficiency associated with a realized tiebreaking cannot be removed without harming student incentives. Finally, we empirically document the extent of potential efficiency loss associated with strategy-proofness and stability, and direct attention to some open questions. (JEL C78, D82, I21).