Not thinking straight? A critical discourse analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General


Autoria(s): Mullins, Jackie (Gertrude Jacqueline)
Contribuinte(s)

Leane, Máire

O'Riordan, Jacqui

University College Cork

Data(s)

16/05/2013

17/05/2014

2013

2013

Resumo

The recognition and protection of constitutional rights is a fundamental precept. In Ireland, the right to marry is provided for in the equality provisions of Article 40 of the Irish Constitution (1937). However, lesbians and gay men are denied the right to marry in Ireland. The ‘last word’ on this issue came into being in the High Court in 2006, when Katherine Zappone and Ann Louise Gilligan sought, but failed, to have their Canadian marriage recognised in Ireland. My thesis centres on this constitutional court ruling. So as to contextualise the pursuit of marriage equality in Ireland, I provide details of the Irish trajectory vis-à-vis relationship and family recognition for same-sex couples. In Chapter One, I discuss the methodological orientation of my research, which derives from a critical perspective. Chapter Two denotes my theorisation of the principle of equality and the concept of difference. In Chapter Three, I discuss the history of the institution of marriage in the West with its legislative underpinning. Marriage also has a constitutional underpinning in Ireland, which derives from Article 41 of our Constitution. In Chapter Four, I discuss ways in which marriage and family were conceptualised in Ireland, by looking at historical controversies surrounding the legalisation of contraception and divorce. Chapter Five denotes a Critical Discourse Analysis of the High Court ruling in Zappone and Gilligan. In Chapter Six, I critique text from three genres of discourse, i.e. ‘Letters to the Editor’ regarding same-sex marriage in Ireland, communication from legislators vis-à-vis the 2004 legislative impediment to same-sex marriage in Ireland, and parliamentary debates surrounding the 2010 enactment of civil partnership legislation in Ireland. I conclude my research by reflecting on my methodological and theoretical considerations with a view to answering my research questions. Author’s Update: Following the outcome of the 2015 constitutional referendum vis-à-vis Article 41, marriage equality has been realised in Ireland.

University College Cork (William Thompson Scholarship, Applied Social Studies, UCC)

Accepted Version

Not peer reviewed

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

Mullins, J. 2013. Not thinking straight? A critical discourse analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General. PhD Thesis, University College Cork.

413

http://hdl.handle.net/10468/1128

Idioma(s)

en

en

Publicador

University College Cork

Relação

http://library.ucc.ie/record=b2073900

Direitos

© 2013, Jackie Mullins

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Palavras-Chave #Zappone and Gilligan #Ireland #Irish Constitution, 1937 #Civil Registration Act, 2004 #Equality #Critical discourse analysis #Marriage equality #Same sex marriage #Same-sex marriage--Law and legislation--Ireland. #Gay couples--Legal status, laws, etc.--Ireland. #Gilligan, Ann Louise #Zappone, Katherine
Tipo

Doctoral thesis

Doctoral

PhD (Arts)