How Spinal Neural Networks Reduce Discrepancies between Motor Intention and Motor Realization


Autoria(s): Bullock, Daniel; Contreras-Vidal, José
Data(s)

14/11/2011

14/11/2011

01/10/1991

Resumo

This paper attempts a rational, step-by-step reconstruction of many aspects of the mammalian neural circuitry known to be involved in the spinal cord's regulation of opposing muscles acting on skeletal segments. Mathematical analyses and local circuit simulations based on neural membrane equations are used to clarify the behavioral function of five fundamental cell types, their complex connectivities, and their physiological actions. These cell types are: α-MNs, γ-MNs, IaINs, IbINs, and Renshaw cells. It is shown that many of the complexities of spinal circuitry are necessary to ensure near invariant realization of motor intentions when descending signals of two basic types independently vary over large ranges of magnitude and rate of change. Because these two types of signal afford independent control, or Factorization, of muscle LEngth and muscle TEnsion, our construction was named the FLETE model (Bullock and Grossberg, 1988b, 1989). The present paper significantly extends the range of experimental data encompassed by this evolving model.

National Science Foundation (IRI-87-16960, IRI-90-24877); Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/2144/2078

Idioma(s)

en_US

Publicador

Boston University Center for Adaptive Systems and Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems

Relação

BU CAS/CNS Technical Reports;CAS/CNS-TR-1991-023

Direitos

Copyright 1991 Boston University. Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that: 1. The copies are not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage; 2. the report title, author, document number, and release date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of BOSTON UNIVERSITY TRUSTEES. To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires a fee and / or special permission.

Boston University Trustees

Tipo

Technical Report